public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jaikumar Ganesh <jaikumarg@gmail.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Nick Pelly <npelly@google.com>,
	Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, johan.hedberg@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Some kernel changes
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:18:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac290f760901280218q3eefc51es5e3b500c629f6c68@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233136775.2139.3.camel@violet>

Hi Marcel,

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Jaikumar,
>
>> >> >>>>> why do you wanna set AUTH_PENDING again. That is not needed we only
>> >> >>>>> wanna know once encryption comes back on. If no in time, then we just
>> >> >>>>> disconnect the link. That simple.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>  b) I also see that we are not clearing the timer and hence after
>> >> >>>>>> RFCOMM_AUTH_TIMEOUT period expires we bring down the RFCOMM connection
>> >> >>>>>> even though the encryption has been established.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Good catch. Fixed it.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Cool.  Can you upload it to bluetooth-testing git ? I saw a related
>> >> >>>> problem while looking at the timer issue and wanted to see if the fix
>> >> >>>> takes care of it.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I am in the process in doing so, but there are other important things
>> >> >>> that need to be done first.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry to push you on this, is this patch been uploaded ?
>> >> >
>> >> > since a few days now. Check the bluetooth-testing.git and it is even rebased
>> >> > against 2.6.29-rc2.
>> >> >
>> >> I applied the patches and I see that we actually don't pause the
>> >> RFCOMM tx traffic because we don't check on
>> >> the RFCOMM_SEC_PENDING flag when sending the tx packets in rfcomm_process_dlcs.
>> >> I verified this using the "attest" command - we keep sending RFCOMM
>> >> traffic even though encryption is off.
>> >>
>> >> Please look at the patch attached.
>> >>
>> >> Also should we drop the "rx" packets too  when the encryption is dropped ?
>> >
>> > can you get me a version with a proper commit message. Just the subject
>> > is not gonna be good enough.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, its attached. Also like mentioned above the patch checks only
>> while sending tx packets ?
>> Should we drop "rx" packets also ?
>
> patch looks fine to me, but you need to fix/revert the comment change ;)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
> index ae2ecaa..73ffc0c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/*
> +f*
>    RFCOMM implementation for Linux Bluetooth stack (BlueZ).
>    Copyright (C) 2002 Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
>    Copyright (C) 2002 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
>
> And I like to have a little bit more detailed commit message please.
>
   Sure I will resubmit
   Also, should we drop the "rx" packets ?

Thanks
Jaikumar
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>

>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-28 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-10 12:33 [RFC] Some kernel changes Ville Tervo
2009-01-10 14:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-10 14:26   ` Johan Hedberg
2009-01-12 13:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-12 17:15   ` Nick Pelly
2009-01-13 19:12     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 19:13       ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-15 23:25         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 23:52           ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-16  9:47             ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-20 18:54               ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-20 20:02                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-21  0:28                   ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-21 11:19                     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-21 17:46                       ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-28  9:27                         ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-28  9:59                         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-28 10:18                           ` jaikumar Ganesh [this message]
2009-01-28 10:35                             ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 19:14       ` jaikumar Ganesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac290f760901280218q3eefc51es5e3b500c629f6c68@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jaikumarg@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=npelly@google.com \
    --cc=ville.tervo@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox