From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at extent_map.c:275!
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:34:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216910080.6932.174.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216749897.3019.18.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 14:04 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 10:42 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:03 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > >> Well, the test is there to make sure the caller is doing the right
> > >> thing. Before we remove it, I'd like to understand why it is failing.
> > >
> > > Because this is a uniprocessor kernel. So spin_lock() and spin_unlock()
> > > both do absolutely nothing, and spin_trylock() _always_ returns 1.
> >
> > How about using assert_spin_locked()?
>
> Yeah, that should work if we still need these checks.
>
This one is applied now and pushed out.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 3:32 [PATCH] Use do_div() instead of native 64-bit division in btrfs_ordered_sum_size() David Woodhouse
2008-07-22 3:36 ` kernel BUG at extent_map.c:275! David Woodhouse
2008-07-22 10:21 ` Chris Mason
2008-07-22 14:35 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-22 17:03 ` Chris Mason
2008-07-22 17:41 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-22 17:42 ` Zach Brown
2008-07-22 18:04 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-24 14:34 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2008-07-22 18:12 ` Chris Mason
2008-07-22 14:43 ` [PATCH] Remove BUG_ON(spin_trylock()) checks which have false positives on UP David Woodhouse
2008-07-23 11:13 ` [PATCH] Use do_div() instead of native 64-bit division in btrfs_ordered_sum_size() Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 13:28 ` Chris Mason
2008-07-23 21:07 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-24 0:19 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216910080.6932.174.camel@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox