public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] New fs-specific Kconfig options should go in fs/$FS/Kconfig, not fs/Kconfig.
@ 2009-02-04  2:58 Jeff Mahoney
  2009-02-04 18:59 ` Chris Mason
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Mahoney @ 2009-02-04  2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Btrfs Development List; +Cc: Jeff Mahoney

 Commit 699b6faa2ab283219914501d5117f8a93c7e441b allowed btrfs ACLs to
 be selectable, but put the option in the main fs/Kconfig, and didn't
 make it depend on btrfs.

 This patch moves the option and adds the dependency.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---

 fs/Kconfig       |   13 -------------
 fs/btrfs/Kconfig |   15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 6198082..ef81718 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@ -51,19 +51,6 @@ source "fs/xfs/Kconfig"
 source "fs/gfs2/Kconfig"
 source "fs/ocfs2/Kconfig"
 source "fs/btrfs/Kconfig"
-
-config BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
-	bool "Btrfs POSIX Access Control Lists"
-	select FS_POSIX_ACL
-	help
-	  POSIX Access Control Lists (ACLs) support permissions for users and
-	  groups beyond the owner/group/world scheme.
-
-	  To learn more about Access Control Lists, visit the POSIX ACLs for
-	  Linux website <http://acl.bestbits.at/>.
-
-	  If you don't know what Access Control Lists are, say N
-
 endif # BLOCK
 
 source "fs/notify/Kconfig"
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
index f8fcf99..42e91e3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/btrfs/Kconfig
@@ -16,3 +16,18 @@ config BTRFS_FS
 	  module will be called btrfs.
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
+
+config BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
+	bool "Btrfs POSIX Access Control Lists"
+	depends on BTRFS_FS
+	select FS_POSIX_ACL
+	help
+	  POSIX Access Control Lists (ACLs) support permissions for users and
+	  groups beyond the owner/group/world scheme.
+
+	  To learn more about Access Control Lists, visit the POSIX ACLs for
+	  Linux website <http://acl.bestbits.at/>.
+
+	  If you don't know what Access Control Lists are, say N
+
+
-- 
1.6.0.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] New fs-specific Kconfig options should go in fs/$FS/Kconfig, not fs/Kconfig.
  2009-02-04  2:58 [PATCH] New fs-specific Kconfig options should go in fs/$FS/Kconfig, not fs/Kconfig Jeff Mahoney
@ 2009-02-04 18:59 ` Chris Mason
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2009-02-04 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Mahoney; +Cc: Btrfs Development List, Jeff Mahoney

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 21:58 -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> Commit 699b6faa2ab283219914501d5117f8a93c7e441b allowed btrfs ACLs to
>  be selectable, but put the option in the main fs/Kconfig, and didn't
>  make it depend on btrfs.
> 
>  This patch moves the option and adds the dependency.
> 

FYI, I did merge this but folded it into the original ACL patch.  I
rebased the tree because Yan found a bug that could cause corruption
during btrfs-vol -b processing.

So, if you've pulled the unstable tree, you'll want to pull again and
git gc

-chris



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-04 18:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-04  2:58 [PATCH] New fs-specific Kconfig options should go in fs/$FS/Kconfig, not fs/Kconfig Jeff Mahoney
2009-02-04 18:59 ` Chris Mason

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox