Re: btrfs volume mounts and dies (was Re: Segfault in btrfsck)

[Steve Freitas <sflist@ihonk.com>]

Should I take it by the lack of list response that I should just flush
this partition down the toilet and start over? Or is everybody either
flummoxed or on vacation?

Steve

On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 16:37 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 14:57 -0800, Steve Freitas wrote:
> > Got some more information. I installed Debian on another disk ("rescue")
> > running 2.6.32, pulled the latest btrfs module code from git, applied an
> > earlier mentioned patch[1], then compiled and loaded the new module.
> > It's able to mount the volume initially...
> 
> I've just tried it again with the pure git pull, no patch, and the
> result (of an "ls -R /mnt/btrfs_vol") was the same. 'Cept this time it
> never gave me a kernel traceback, just unending lines like:
> 
> Jan  3 16:36:36 rescue kernel: [ 1046.494252] parent transid verify
> failed on 69140480 wanted 28342 found 29646
> 
> Steve
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html