Re: btrfs volume mounts and dies (was Re: Segfault in btrfsck)

[Steve Freitas <sflist@ihonk.com>]

Hi Sander,

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 08:52 +0100, Sander wrote:
> I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a
> lot of bad sectors on that disk reported by SMART.
> 
> If that is indeed the case it might be dificult for the people who might
> be able to help you, to help you.

Thanks for your  response. You're correct about the bad sector warning.
So please correct me if I have some mistaken assumptions. I thought
btrfs would be tolerant of that -- if a block failed the checksum test,
it would reconstruct and remap it. (Also, I assumed that if a drive
hadn't filled its bad sector remapping table, it could handle it at the
hardware level, and SMART's warning was just that -- a warning, not a
dire pronouncement of utter unsuitability -- but that's something else.)

Steve