public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: sysfs: Add bdi link to the fsid dir
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:41:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13a4a81b-0415-42c2-bb56-d62f5f64633d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702133618.GN27795@twin.jikos.cz>



On 2.07.20 г. 16:36 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:25:30AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On 7/2/20 8:23 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>> Since BTRFS uses a private bdi it makes sense to create a link to this
>>> bdi under /sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/bdi. This allows size of read ahead to
>>> be controlled. Without this patch it's not possible to uniquely identify
>>> which bdi pertains to which btrfs filesystem in the fase of multiple
>>> btrfs filesystem.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
>>
>> Was confused why we needed to make sure the link existed before removing it, 
>> since other things sysfs is smart enough to figure out.  Apparently it has a 
>> WARN_ON() if the parent isn't initialized, so the check is necessary, albeit 
>> annoying.
> 
> There must be a better way, this is just too weird. We can check if
> objects have been initialized by peeking to kobject::state_initialized
> and we use that already for fsid_kobj in __btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid or
> btrfs_sysfs_feature_update.
> 

Awesome, will use this for v2.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-02 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-02 12:23 [PATCH 0/7] Corrupt counter improvement Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: Make get_state_failrec return failrec directly Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:07   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:25     ` David Sterba
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: Streamline btrfs_get_io_failure_record logic Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:13   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: Record btrfs_device directly btrfs_io_bio Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:14   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:16   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-03  8:14   ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-03 13:06     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: Don't check for btrfs_device::bdev in btrfs_end_bio Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:15   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: Increment device corruption error in case of checksum error Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:18   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:21   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-02 14:44     ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: Remove needless ASSERT Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:19   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: Increment corrupt device counter during compressed read Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:21   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:28   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-02 12:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: sysfs: Add bdi link to the fsid dir Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-02 13:25   ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-02 13:36     ` David Sterba
2020-07-02 14:41       ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-07-03  8:13   ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2020-07-05 11:39     ` Anand Jain
2020-07-03 15:32 ` [PATCH 0/7] Corrupt counter improvement David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13a4a81b-0415-42c2-bb56-d62f5f64633d@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox