public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* R: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed
@ 2010-01-22 12:37 kreijack
  2010-01-22 13:18 ` Thomas Kupper
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kreijack @ 2010-01-22 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thomas; +Cc: linux-btrfs, Leszek Ciesielski

Hi Thomas,

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: thomas@kupper.org
>Data: 22/01/2010 10.48
>A: "Leszek Ciesielski"<skolima@gmail.com>
>Cc: "linux-btrfs"<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
>Ogg: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed
>
>
>On 22 Jan 2010, at 10:40, Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Kupper <thomas@kupper.org> wrote:
[...]
>> Doesn't 'cat /proc/mounts' show the actually used mount options?
>
>No, it doesn't in my case - Ubuntu 9.10 with 2.6.32-10-generic kernel.
>
>thomas # cat /proc/mounts | fgrep ' / '
>rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
>/dev/sda3 / btrfs rw,relatime 0 0
>
>thomas # cat /proc/cmdline
>[...] root=/dev/sda3 ro rootflags=subvol=rootfs-snapshot-001--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


The btrfs code doesn't show the subvol= mount option in cat /proc/mount. I 
sent a patch which should solve it.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487

But today it is not merged.

Br
Goffredo



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-22 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-22 12:37 R: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed kreijack
2010-01-22 13:18 ` Thomas Kupper

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox