* Definitive btrfs git tree ?
@ 2009-01-12 20:26 Chris Samuel
2009-01-12 21:28 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Samuel @ 2009-01-12 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 303 bytes --]
Hi Chris,
Now btrfs has made it into the mainline, which git tree is definitive now ?
cheers!
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Definitive btrfs git tree ?
2009-01-12 20:26 Definitive btrfs git tree ? Chris Samuel
@ 2009-01-12 21:28 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-13 7:24 ` Chris Samuel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2009-01-12 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Samuel; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 07:26 +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Now btrfs has made it into the mainline, which git tree is definitive now ?
Only mainline is definitive ;)
We'll have a tree with stable fixes that we want Linus to pull, and
we'll have a development tree with unstable experimental stuff (these
aren't yet named).
For the progs, the btrfs-progs-unstable tree is up to date and safe.
I'll make something with a less scary name later this week, and save the
unstable tree for development.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Definitive btrfs git tree ?
2009-01-12 21:28 ` Chris Mason
@ 2009-01-13 7:24 ` Chris Samuel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Samuel @ 2009-01-13 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 809 bytes --]
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 8:28:21 am Chris Mason wrote:
> Only mainline is definitive ;)
Oh ha ha! ;-)
> We'll have a tree with stable fixes that we want Linus to pull, and
> we'll have a development tree with unstable experimental stuff (these
> aren't yet named).
Ah, so for the moment stick with btrfs-unstable-standalone ?
> For the progs, the btrfs-progs-unstable tree is up to date and safe.
> I'll make something with a less scary name later this week, and save the
> unstable tree for development.
Cool, not scary is good (though I'm happy to stay with the scary one).
cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-13 7:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-12 20:26 Definitive btrfs git tree ? Chris Samuel
2009-01-12 21:28 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-13 7:24 ` Chris Samuel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox