public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: snapshot-removal - timeline ?
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:33:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804183307.GG5693@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7EC11C2E-889E-42A4-80D8-EA7E80F4963D@karlsbakk.net>

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> On 3. aug.. 2009, at 18.18, Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> >>On 3. aug.. 2009, at 15.04, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:03:37PM +0200, Roland wrote:
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>is there a timeline for snapshot-removal ?
> >>>>
> >>>>i did intensively play with btrfs about a year ago and was really
> >>>>impressed, but i quit due to the lack of snapshot removal.
> >>>>(i tried btrfs mostly because of the snapshot feature)
> >>>>
> >>>>has there been some progress on this or is there a timeline when
> >>>>this feature will be available ?
> >>>>
> >>>>i wonder if it`s just so hard to implement or if it`s  just too low
> >>>>priority on the todo list..... maybe both ? ;)
> >>>
> >>>Its a little of both ;)  The plan is to have this in 2.6.32
> >>
> >>
> >>Last I heard, someone was saying .31... Is it being moved?
> >
> >Yes, it was delayed so we could finalize the other changes in .31.
> 
> 
> It's strange that such a small thing should be delayed so much. If
> snapshot removal was working, I'm quite sure we might get more users
> and thereby more stable code faster.

It's a small feature but it gets deep into the difficult parts of the
dentry cache to do it right.  So, it definitely isn't easy.

-chris


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-01 12:03 snapshot-removal - timeline ? Roland
2009-08-03 13:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 14:33   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-03 16:18     ` Chris Mason
2009-08-04  7:52       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-04 15:02         ` Brian Neu
2009-08-04 18:33         ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-08-05 11:18           ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-05 11:54             ` Josef Bacik
2009-08-05 18:28             ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-08-05 18:46               ` Christian Mikovits
2009-08-05 19:40                 ` Andrey Kuzmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090804183307.GG5693@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox