public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Neu <proclivity76@yahoo.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: snapshot-removal - timeline ?
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44663.24759.qm@web51910.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7EC11C2E-889E-42A4-80D8-EA7E80F4963D@karlsbakk.net>


> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> is there a timeline for snapshot-removal
> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> i did intensively play with btrfs about a
> year ago and was really
> >>>> impressed, but i quit due to the lack of
> snapshot removal.
> >>>> (i tried btrfs mostly because of the
> snapshot feature)
> >>>>
> >>>> has there been some progress on this or is
> there a timeline when
> >>>> this feature will be available ?
> >>>>
> >>>> i wonder if it`s just so hard to implement
> or if it`s  just too low
> >>>> priority on the todo list..... maybe both
> ? ;)
> >>>
> >>> Its a little of both ;)  The plan is to
> have this in 2.6.32
> >>
> >>
> >> Last I heard, someone was saying .31... Is it
> being moved?
> >
> > Yes, it was delayed so we could finalize the other
> changes in .31.
>
>
> It's strange that such a small thing should be delayed so
> much. If snapshot removal was working, I'm quite sure we
> might get more users and thereby more stable code faster.
>
> roy
> --


I don't know whether it's small in required effort, but I know as a user the feature would be big.  I actually have a non-critical, redundant backup system that I was set to install with .31, betting on the snapshot removal.  You can't please all the people all the time, but I thought I'd write to voice an opinion for prioritizing it for .32.  Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-01 12:03 snapshot-removal - timeline ? Roland
2009-08-03 13:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 14:33   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-03 16:18     ` Chris Mason
2009-08-04  7:52       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-04 15:02         ` Brian Neu [this message]
2009-08-04 18:33         ` Chris Mason
2009-08-05 11:18           ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-05 11:54             ` Josef Bacik
2009-08-05 18:28             ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-08-05 18:46               ` Christian Mikovits
2009-08-05 19:40                 ` Andrey Kuzmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44663.24759.qm@web51910.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=proclivity76@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox