From: Brian Neu <proclivity76@yahoo.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: snapshot-removal - timeline ?
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44663.24759.qm@web51910.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7EC11C2E-889E-42A4-80D8-EA7E80F4963D@karlsbakk.net>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> is there a timeline for snapshot-removal
> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> i did intensively play with btrfs about a
> year ago and was really
> >>>> impressed, but i quit due to the lack of
> snapshot removal.
> >>>> (i tried btrfs mostly because of the
> snapshot feature)
> >>>>
> >>>> has there been some progress on this or is
> there a timeline when
> >>>> this feature will be available ?
> >>>>
> >>>> i wonder if it`s just so hard to implement
> or if it`s just too low
> >>>> priority on the todo list..... maybe both
> ? ;)
> >>>
> >>> Its a little of both ;) The plan is to
> have this in 2.6.32
> >>
> >>
> >> Last I heard, someone was saying .31... Is it
> being moved?
> >
> > Yes, it was delayed so we could finalize the other
> changes in .31.
>
>
> It's strange that such a small thing should be delayed so
> much. If snapshot removal was working, I'm quite sure we
> might get more users and thereby more stable code faster.
>
> roy
> --
I don't know whether it's small in required effort, but I know as a user the feature would be big. I actually have a non-critical, redundant backup system that I was set to install with .31, betting on the snapshot removal. You can't please all the people all the time, but I thought I'd write to voice an opinion for prioritizing it for .32. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-01 12:03 snapshot-removal - timeline ? Roland
2009-08-03 13:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 14:33 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-03 16:18 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-04 7:52 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-04 15:02 ` Brian Neu [this message]
2009-08-04 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-05 11:18 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-05 11:54 ` Josef Bacik
2009-08-05 18:28 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-08-05 18:46 ` Christian Mikovits
2009-08-05 19:40 ` Andrey Kuzmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44663.24759.qm@web51910.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
--to=proclivity76@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox