Re: [patch] btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption

[Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>]

On Thu, Aug 20 2009, Yan, Zheng  wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:59:07AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 19 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:46:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Aug 19 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >> > > > See my other reply. It *can* work with key aliases, but this particular
> >> > > > code does not.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > It is pretty easy obviously to put in duplicates because the rbtree
> >> > > > code doesn't know about keys, but if we do this then it looks like
> >> > > > it might cause the search code to miss some valid inodes and instead
> >> > > > return freeing inodes -- so you'd also have to look at that and update
> >> > > > it which is why I didn't go down this route..
> >> > >
> >> > > Mine was just a generic statement, I didn't read the btrfs code (hence
> >> > > my comment about potential lookup bug, if you allow aliases you have to
> >> > > be careful).
> >> >
> >> > Ah ok. Well yeah in this case btrfs is definitely wrong in the way it
> >> > tried to insert aliases.
> >>
> >> I looked at the actual problem now and I agree, it cannot work that way.
> >> I don't know if Linus is planning another -rc, we should probably get
> >> this upstream sooner rather than later. Chris is away this week, so if
> >> we can get Yan to agree on this patch as well, I'll submit it.
> > I think the first patch I submitted was agreed?
> >
> 
> Of course, thank you.

Yan, are you sending this upstream?

-- 
Jens Axboe