* BTRFS major fault
@ 2009-12-16 18:29 regomodo
2009-12-16 19:37 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: regomodo @ 2009-12-16 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
I was running linux-kernel-2.6.32.1 and suspended my system using
"hibernate-ram".
When I resumed the system was OK for a moment then froze up. I managed to
get to tty1 easily and saw errors relating to btrfs.
I did not manage to get the error down but it had an abbreviation of
checksum and said maybe something about an inode/node. There was maybe 2
numbers possibly separated by ":". I'm pretty sure the numbers were the
same at each stderr printout. Sorry for the vagueness.
Anyway. I tried to "reboot" but the errors continued and the shutdown
process wasn't happening. I r.e.i.s.u.b and reboot back into my system
The btrfs FS/volumes wouldn't mount so I tried to run a btrfsck. This is
what I got:
funtoo-pc ~ # btrfsck /dev/sda
failed to read /dev/sdf
failed to read /dev/sr0
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted
funtoo-pc ~ # btrfsck /dev/sdb
failed to read /dev/sdf
failed to read /dev/sr0
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted
ENV: funtoo-amd64; linux-2.6.32.1; x1 Btrfs FS, made up of x2 Samsung 500GB
sata hdd, in Raid0, and contained x2 subvolumes
I'm not trying to fix my issue -- I have a backup -- just reporting
something I found.
Cheers
Reg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BTRFS major fault
2009-12-16 18:29 BTRFS major fault regomodo
@ 2009-12-16 19:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-12-16 20:34 ` regomodo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2009-12-16 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: regomodo; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:29:38PM +0000, regomodo wrote:
> I was running linux-kernel-2.6.32.1 and suspended my system using
> "hibernate-ram".
>
> When I resumed the system was OK for a moment then froze up. I managed to
> get to tty1 easily and saw errors relating to btrfs.
> I did not manage to get the error down but it had an abbreviation of
> checksum and said maybe something about an inode/node.
These show disk corruption, which is also what the btrfsck errors
report. How exactly are you doing suspend?
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BTRFS major fault
2009-12-16 19:37 ` Chris Mason
@ 2009-12-16 20:34 ` regomodo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: regomodo @ 2009-12-16 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, linux-btrfs
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 19:37:48 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:29:38PM +0000, regomodo wrote:
> > I was running linux-kernel-2.6.32.1 and suspended my system using
> > "hibernate-ram".
> >
> > When I resumed the system was OK for a moment then froze up. I managed to
> > get to tty1 easily and saw errors relating to btrfs.
> > I did not manage to get the error down but it had an abbreviation of
> > checksum and said maybe something about an inode/node.
>
> These show disk corruption, which is also what the btrfsck errors
> report. How exactly are you doing suspend?
>
>From the command-line, as root, with "hibernate-ram".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-16 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-16 18:29 BTRFS major fault regomodo
2009-12-16 19:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-12-16 20:34 ` regomodo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox