* Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
@ 2010-01-20 18:31 Mr. Tux
2010-01-25 18:43 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mr. Tux @ 2010-01-20 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hi list
I tried to mount the intact device of a two memer btrfs raid array with one
device missing:
# mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /mnt
this wouldn't work with kernel 2.6.32-2 - caused some sort of memory segfault
# btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt
complained and refused to mount the array degraded with only one intact array
member left -> demanded two intact members
How can I mount this array anyway?
thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
2010-01-20 18:31 Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid? Mr. Tux
@ 2010-01-25 18:43 ` Josef Bacik
2010-01-25 21:46 ` Mr. Tux
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2010-01-25 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mr. Tux; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:31:24PM +0100, Mr. Tux wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I tried to mount the intact device of a two memer btrfs raid array with one
> device missing:
>
> # mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /mnt
>
> this wouldn't work with kernel 2.6.32-2 - caused some sort of memory segfault
>
> # btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt
>
> complained and refused to mount the array degraded with only one intact array
> member left -> demanded two intact members
>
> How can I mount this array anyway?
>
How did you setup this array to begin with? I'm trying to reproduce this bug
but I haven't been able to. Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
2010-01-25 18:43 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2010-01-25 21:46 ` Mr. Tux
2010-01-25 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mr. Tux @ 2010-01-25 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
On Monday 25 January 2010 19.43:27 Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> How did you setup this array to begin with? I'm trying to reproduce this
> bug but I haven't been able to. Thanks,
>
Hi Josef,
Thanks for your help!
Linux Kernel 2.6.32.2 from kernel.org (was marked as stable at that time, I
compiled it using make-kpkg with btrfs support inside the kernel -> not
modular)
OS: Debian Lenny 5.03
I created the btrfs raid on a two sata-II drives like this:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid 1 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
Then I mounted the btrfs with:
mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/
cat /proc/mounts and dmesg showed the raid was mounted successfully
Then I started to copy large amount of data into the raid1 from a file server.
With the copying process ongoing I detached the data cable from one device to
simulate hardware failure. Copying process went on as planed to the drive
still attached.
Then I unmounted the btrfs raid like this:
umount /mnt/
and I shut down the system.
Now the goal was to boot and mount only the intact btrfs partition again as a
degraded raid.
I followed the multiple-device-wiki of btrfs [1]
I didn't try to remove the faulty device - I shut down the system already and
booted again without the faulty drive. So I tried this:
mount -o degraded /dev/sda /mnt/
This caused a memory segfault - the system still ran, but I couldn't use the
array any more.
So I used the next command
btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt
Complained it couldn't mount with only one member present.
My assumption: Bad luck with the kernel - or did this memory segfault happen
on earlier kernel versions as well?
[1]
http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
2010-01-25 21:46 ` Mr. Tux
@ 2010-01-25 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
2010-01-26 12:20 ` Mr. Tux
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2010-01-25 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mr. Tux; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:46:47PM +0100, Mr. Tux wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010 19.43:27 Josef Bacik wrote:
> >
> > How did you setup this array to begin with? I'm trying to reproduce this
> > bug but I haven't been able to. Thanks,
> >
>
> Hi Josef,
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Linux Kernel 2.6.32.2 from kernel.org (was marked as stable at that time, I
> compiled it using make-kpkg with btrfs support inside the kernel -> not
> modular)
>
> OS: Debian Lenny 5.03
>
> I created the btrfs raid on a two sata-II drives like this:
>
> mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid 1 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb4
>
> Then I mounted the btrfs with:
>
> mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/
>
> cat /proc/mounts and dmesg showed the raid was mounted successfully
>
> Then I started to copy large amount of data into the raid1 from a file server.
> With the copying process ongoing I detached the data cable from one device to
> simulate hardware failure. Copying process went on as planed to the drive
> still attached.
>
> Then I unmounted the btrfs raid like this:
>
> umount /mnt/
>
> and I shut down the system.
>
> Now the goal was to boot and mount only the intact btrfs partition again as a
> degraded raid.
>
> I followed the multiple-device-wiki of btrfs [1]
>
> I didn't try to remove the faulty device - I shut down the system already and
> booted again without the faulty drive. So I tried this:
>
> mount -o degraded /dev/sda /mnt/
>
> This caused a memory segfault - the system still ran, but I couldn't use the
> array any more.
>
> So I used the next command
>
> btrfs-vol -r missing /mnt
>
> Complained it couldn't mount with only one member present.
>
> My assumption: Bad luck with the kernel - or did this memory segfault happen
> on earlier kernel versions as well?
>
> [1]
> http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_Failed_Devices
>
Hmm well I'm trying to reproduce that here and it's working fine, course I can't
pull a cable on my disk since I only have one disk to test with. Would you mind
sending me your dmesg after you try
mount -o degraded /dev/sda1 /mnt/
so I can see whats going on. Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
2010-01-25 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2010-01-26 12:20 ` Mr. Tux
2010-01-27 2:12 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mr. Tux @ 2010-01-26 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
On Monday 25 January 2010 23:08:39 Josef Bacik wrote:
Hi Josef
>
> Hmm well I'm trying to reproduce that here and it's working fine, course I
> can't pull a cable on my disk since I only have one disk to test with.
> Would you mind sending me your dmesg after you try
>
> mount -o degraded /dev/sda1 /mnt/
>
> so I can see whats going on. Thanks,
>
Did you try 2.6.32.2 from kernel.org? Is it possible to use a second test
drive like I did? I know you can create a raid array with one device missing,
but the segfault happened with a two member raid1.
I don't have the test environment any more, so I can't offer a backtrace right
now - but I will set it up again in the next few days. If it happens again I
will contact you and send you a backtrace.
Mr. Tux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid?
2010-01-26 12:20 ` Mr. Tux
@ 2010-01-27 2:12 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2010-01-27 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mr. Tux; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Mr. Tux wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010 23:08:39 Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> Hi Josef
>
> >
> > Hmm well I'm trying to reproduce that here and it's working fine, course I
> > can't pull a cable on my disk since I only have one disk to test with.
> > Would you mind sending me your dmesg after you try
> >
> > mount -o degraded /dev/sda1 /mnt/
> >
> > so I can see whats going on. Thanks,
> >
>
> Did you try 2.6.32.2 from kernel.org? Is it possible to use a second test
> drive like I did? I know you can create a raid array with one device missing,
> but the segfault happened with a two member raid1.
>
> I don't have the test environment any more, so I can't offer a backtrace right
> now - but I will set it up again in the next few days. If it happens again I
> will contact you and send you a backtrace.
>
Ok I think I've tracked down all the various problems that you were having with
this. I've sent 3 patches to the list just now
Btrfs: check total number of devices when removing missing
Btrfs: check return value of open_bdev_exclusive properly
Btrfs: do not mark the chunk as readonly if in degraded mode
Make sure you run btrfsctl -a before running mount -o degraded. I made that
mistake and things still didnt work. Let me know if you have any problems.
Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-27 2:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-20 18:31 Howto mount intact left-over device of a degraded btrfs-raid? Mr. Tux
2010-01-25 18:43 ` Josef Bacik
2010-01-25 21:46 ` Mr. Tux
2010-01-25 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
2010-01-26 12:20 ` Mr. Tux
2010-01-27 2:12 ` Josef Bacik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox