Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>,
	Linux Btrfs List <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sleeping function called from atomic context
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:12:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504151227.GB25477@shiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504133615.GC19331@twin.jikos.cz>

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:36:16PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:25:36AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > I'm having a hard time reproducing this here.  Do you have lockdep on?
> > It might tell us which lock we're leaving around.
> 
> He's using SLUB and it does not like waiting allocations when
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is on:
> 
>  445 #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> ...
>  935 /*
>  936  * Hooks for other subsystems that check memory allocations. In a typical
>  937  * production configuration these hooks all should produce no code at all.
>  938  */
>  939 static inline int slab_pre_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
>  940 {
>  941         flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
>  942         lockdep_trace_alloc(flags);
>  943         might_sleep_if(flags & __GFP_WAIT);
>  944
>  945         return should_failslab(s->objsize, flags, s->flags);
>  946 }
> ...
> 1223 #else
> ...
> 1259 static inline int slab_pre_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
> 1260                                                         { return 0; }
> 
> where slab_pre_alloc_hook is called down the chain from kmem_cache_alloc.

Right, but this should be after the fact, we're not supposed to be
holding any locks here.  Lockdep should tell us which lock is still
held, which will make it much easier.

-chris


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04 10:18 [BUG] sleeping function called from atomic context Stefan Behrens
2012-05-04 13:25 ` Chris Mason
2012-05-04 13:36   ` David Sterba
2012-05-04 15:12     ` Chris Mason [this message]
2012-05-04 15:20   ` Stefan Behrens
2012-05-04 15:38     ` Chris Mason
2012-05-04 15:50     ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120504151227.GB25477@shiny \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox