Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: Linux Btrfs List <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sleeping function called from atomic context
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:50:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504155045.GD25477@shiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA3F3B0.6020902@giantdisaster.de>

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> On 5/4/2012 3:25 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> >> Looks like after "btrfs read error corrected" of chunk tree block while
> >> reading the chunk tree in open_ctree(), we stay in atomic state (in
> >> 3.4-rc5).
> > 
> > I'm having a hard time reproducing this here.  Do you have lockdep on?
> > It might tell us which lock we're leaving around.
> 
> Next two tries with lockdep and with a reboot before the mount. For the
> first one I was using dd(1) to damage (overwite) one mirror of the chunk
> tree and the issue was there immediately. The second time with some
> writes to the disk in degraded state and a remount with all disks
> afterwards. This time umount was raising the issue.
> 
> And as Dave wrote, SLUB checks whether someone is in atomic state and
> calls kmem_cache_alloc() with __GFP_WAIT. I see no reason for being in
> atomic state at this point, that's the issue.
> 
> 
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:937
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3650, name: mount

Ok, what we need to do is make a non-blocking version of
verify_parent_transid for the (likely) case where everything is ok.
Pass it a gfp_mask arg and if it is a non-waiting call it needs to
return -EAGAIN.

I'll add it this weekend unless someone beats me to it.

-chris

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04 10:18 [BUG] sleeping function called from atomic context Stefan Behrens
2012-05-04 13:25 ` Chris Mason
2012-05-04 13:36   ` David Sterba
2012-05-04 15:12     ` Chris Mason
2012-05-04 15:20   ` Stefan Behrens
2012-05-04 15:38     ` Chris Mason
2012-05-04 15:50     ` Chris Mason [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120504155045.GD25477@shiny \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox