Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Josef Bacik <JBacik@fusionio.com>,
	Chris Mason <clmason@fusionio.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No space left on device (28)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:16:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326191651.GF28030@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5151F180.4050405@profihost.ag>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:05:36PM -0600, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Hi Josef,
> 
> Am 26.03.2013 18:45, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >> Am 26.03.2013 16:25, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> Am 26.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >>>>>>>> Am 26.03.2013 13:53, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> >>>>>>>> no - it's just mounted with mount -o noatime
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> :~# cat /proc/mounts | grep btrfs
> >>>>>>>> /dev/mapper/raid54tb1 /mnt btrfs rw,noatime,space_cache 0 0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ok I think I see what's going on.  Can you try this patch and see if it fixes
> >>>>>>> it?  Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It still does not fix the problem.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The rsync output looks like this so it does not work for file a but then
> >>>>>> continues on c d e, ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sync -av --progress /backup/ /mnt/
> >>>>>> sending incremental file list
> >>>>>> .etc_openvpn/ipp.txt
> >>>>>>            229 100%    3.99kB/s    0:00:00 (xfer#2, to-check=1009/1196)
> >>>>>> .etc_openvpn/openvpn-status.log
> >>>>>>            360 100%    6.28kB/s    0:00:00 (xfer#3, to-check=1007/1196)
> >>>>>> rsync: rename "/mnt/.etc_openvpn/.ipp.txt.t9lucX" ->
> >>>>>> ".etc_openvpn/ipp.txt": No space left on device (28)
> >>>>>> .log/
> >>>>>> .log/UcliEvt.log
> >>>>>>         104188 100%  147.67kB/s    0:00:00 (xfer#4, to-check=1131/2700)
> >>>>>> .log/auth.log
> >>>>>>       15211522 100%    2.97MB/s    0:00:04 (xfer#5, to-check=1105/2700)
> >>>>>> .log/auth.log.1
> >>>>>>       19431424  61%    7.35MB/s    0:00:01
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> the dmesg output looks like this:
> >>>>>> [  551.321576] returning enospc, space_info 3, size 0 reserved 0, flush
> >>>>>> 2, flush_state 7  dumping space info
> >>>>>> [  551.323694] space_info 4 has 6439526400 free, is full
> >>>>>> [  551.323696] space_info total=25748307968, used=19308666880, pinned=0,
> >>>>>> reserved=49152, may_use=6438453248, readonly=65536
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok so then this is probably it, let me know if it helps.  Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> OK it now has copied a lot of files (170) without an error all were very
> >>>> small.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Welp progress is good.  Throw this into the mix and go again, it's just adding
> >>> some more debugging so I can make sure I'm going down the right rabbit hole.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Output is now:
> >> [ 9587.445642] returning enospc, space_info 3, size 0 reserved 0, flush
> >> 2, flush_state 7  dumping space info
> >> [ 9587.527392] dumping block rsv 2, size 0 reserved 0
> >> [ 9587.567871] dumping block rsv 5, size 196608 reserved 196608
> >> [ 9587.607661] dumping block rsv 1, size 6438256640 reserved 6438256640
> >> [ 9587.646958] space_info 4 has 6439428096 free, is full
> >> [ 9587.646963] space_info total=25748307968, used=19308769280, pinned=0,
> >> reserved=45056, may_use=6438453248, readonly=65536
> >> [ 9587.649410] returning enospc, space_info 3, size 0 reserved 0, flush
> >> 2, flush_state 7  dumping space info
> >> [ 9587.727000] dumping block rsv 2, size 0 reserved 0
> >> [ 9587.765284] dumping block rsv 5, size 98304 reserved 98304
> >> [ 9587.802849] dumping block rsv 1, size 6438256640 reserved 6438256640
> >> [ 9587.839935] space_info 4 has 6439428096 free, is full
> >> [ 9587.839936] space_info total=25748307968, used=19308769280, pinned=0,
> >> reserved=45056, may_use=6438354944, readonly=65536
> >>
> >
> > Well then that looks like I was going down the wrong rabbit hole.  This should
> > fix you up, for real this time ;).  Thanks,
> 
> Yes - this works now. Which of the patches can i drop? Do i just need 
> the last one?
> Is it safe to add another 18TB raid via converting it to btrfs raid0?
> Will the fix be part of 3.9-rc5?
> 

So I'll put together all of the patches that actually need to go up for this and
post them, but basically its the mutex patch, the last patch I sent you and the
one that adjusts the reservations for rename and delete.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-26 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-21  8:03 No space left on device (28) Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-21 18:00 ` Chris Mason
2013-03-21 18:35   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-21 19:02     ` Chris Mason
2013-03-21 19:42       ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-22  6:08         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-22 12:11           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-22 13:53             ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-22 13:56               ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-22 15:54                 ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-22 19:10                   ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-22 20:49                     ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-22 20:55                       ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-25 20:14                         ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26  7:45                           ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-26 12:53                             ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 12:55                               ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-26 13:30                                 ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 13:49                                   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-26 14:44                                     ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 15:03                                       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-26 15:25                                         ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 16:19                                           ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-26 17:45                                             ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 19:05                                               ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-26 19:16                                                 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-03-26 19:22                                                   ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-26 19:38                                                     ` Josef Bacik
2013-03-26 19:47                                                       ` Stefan Priebe
2013-03-22  6:13         ` Roman Mamedov
2013-03-22  6:24           ` cwillu
2013-03-22  6:39             ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-22  6:41               ` cwillu
2013-03-22  7:06                 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-03-22  6:38           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130326191651.GF28030@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=clmason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox