* linux-stable 3.11.8 oopses
@ 2013-11-19 3:00 Charles Cazabon
2013-11-19 3:53 ` Chris Murphy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Cazabon @ 2013-11-19 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: btrfs list
Greetings,
This is more of just a report than anything else. I run linux-stable, and
while btrfs in 3.11.7 seemed fine, I've had oopses ever since installating
3.11.8. The server is not under heavy load when it happens, and it happens
fairly shortly after a clean boot.
The oopses all look like the following; here's a representative couple.
INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2103 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
btrfs-transacti D c1089143 0 2103 2 0x00000000
d2391e80 00000046 d2391e60 c1089143 00000002 f74a1980 c198a100 9204095a
000002b7 c198a100 f7bd7100 efbfa640 f74a1980 d2391e58 c10113a7 f7bd7148
00000000 00000002 efbfa960 d2391e60 c107a391 00000000 d1009a80 d1009bd0
Call Trace:
[<c1089143>] ? idle_balance+0x2a3/0x3b0
[<c10113a7>] ? __switch_to+0xc7/0x340
[<c107a391>] ? finish_task_switch+0x41/0xc0
[<c114c616>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe6/0x100
[<f865d050>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x20/0x30 [btrfs]
[<c15e7e13>] schedule+0x23/0x60
[<c15e64b5>] schedule_timeout+0x1d5/0x240
[<c15e8b1d>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[<f869dc40>] ? btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x270/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[<c103e628>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10
[<c15e8cbf>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50
[<c106d418>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x48/0x70
[<f868418c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x34c/0xa50 [btrfs]
[<f8684cc4>] ? start_transaction+0x84/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[<c105aaa0>] ? cascade+0x130/0x130
[<c106d1b0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30
[<f867d0d9>] transaction_kthread+0x169/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<f867cf70>] ? btrfs_destroy_marked_extents.clone.96.clone.119+0x1e0/0x1e0
[btrfs]
[<c106ca0c>] kthread+0x9c/0xa0
[<c1070000>] ? run_posix_cpu_timers+0x360/0x820
[<c15efef7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
[<c106c970>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
INFO: task btrfs-transacti:2103 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
btrfs-transacti D c1089143 0 2103 2 0x00000000
d2391e80 00000046 d2391e60 c1089143 00000002 f74a1980 c198a100 9204095a
000002b7 c198a100 f7bd7100 efbfa640 f74a1980 d2391e58 c10113a7 f7bd7148
00000000 00000002 efbfa960 d2391e60 c107a391 00000000 d1009a80 d1009bd0
Call Trace:
[<c1089143>] ? idle_balance+0x2a3/0x3b0
[<c10113a7>] ? __switch_to+0xc7/0x340
[<c107a391>] ? finish_task_switch+0x41/0xc0
[<c114c616>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe6/0x100
[<f865d050>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x20/0x30 [btrfs]
[<c15e7e13>] schedule+0x23/0x60
[<c15e64b5>] schedule_timeout+0x1d5/0x240
[<c15e8b1d>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[<f869dc40>] ? btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x270/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[<c103e628>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10
[<c15e8cbf>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x50
[<c106d418>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x48/0x70
[<f868418c>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x34c/0xa50 [btrfs]
[<f8684cc4>] ? start_transaction+0x84/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[<c105aaa0>] ? cascade+0x130/0x130
[<c106d1b0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30
[<f867d0d9>] transaction_kthread+0x169/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<f867cf70>] ? btrfs_destroy_marked_extents.clone.96.clone.119+0x1e0/0x1e0
[btrfs]
[<c106ca0c>] kthread+0x9c/0xa0
[<c1070000>] ? run_posix_cpu_timers+0x360/0x820
[<c15efef7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
[<c106c970>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub
overnight that reported no errors, and I'll do it again now that I've reverted
to 3.11.7.
Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon
GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-stable 3.11.8 oopses
2013-11-19 3:00 linux-stable 3.11.8 oopses Charles Cazabon
@ 2013-11-19 3:53 ` Chris Murphy
2013-11-19 3:54 ` Chris Murphy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Murphy @ 2013-11-19 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Cazabon; +Cc: btrfs list
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Charles Cazabon <charlesc-lists-btrfs@pyropus.ca> wrote:
>
> This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub
> overnight that reported no errors, and I'll do it again now that I've reverted
> to 3.11.7.
>
> Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this?
sysrq+w would dump the blockage to kernel messages. Depending on your kernel you may need to first enable sysrq functions with
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
then
echo 2 > /proc/sysrq-trigger
then
dmesg
Chris Murphy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-stable 3.11.8 oopses
2013-11-19 3:53 ` Chris Murphy
@ 2013-11-19 3:54 ` Chris Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Murphy @ 2013-11-19 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Cazabon; +Cc: btrfs list
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:53 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Charles Cazabon <charlesc-lists-btrfs@pyropus.ca> wrote:
>>
>> This is on x86_64, server-class hardware (ECC memory, etc). I ran a scrub
>> overnight that reported no errors, and I'll do it again now that I've reverted
>> to 3.11.7.
>>
>> Is there any other info that might be useful to the btrfs devs about this?
>
> sysrq+w would dump the blockage to kernel messages. Depending on your kernel you may need to first enable sysrq functions with
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
>
> then
>
> echo 2 > /proc/sysrq-trigger
Cute. That 2 is supposed to be a w, hence sysrq+w.
Chris Murphy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-19 3:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-19 3:00 linux-stable 3.11.8 oopses Charles Cazabon
2013-11-19 3:53 ` Chris Murphy
2013-11-19 3:54 ` Chris Murphy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox