* [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[]
2018-04-25 11:01 [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Anand Jain
@ 2018-04-25 11:01 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[] Anand Jain
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-04-25 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Add a new member struct btrfs_raid_attr::raid_name so that
btrfs_raid_array[] can maintain the name of the raid type,
and so we can kill btrfs_raid_type_names[].
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
v2->v3:
use const char raid_name[8]
v1->v2:
add space after =. Such as..
+ .raid_name = "raid10",
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 18 ------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 90d28a3727c6..4742734a73d7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -7338,24 +7338,6 @@ wait_block_group_cache_done(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
return ret;
}
-static const char *btrfs_raid_type_names[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID10] = "raid10",
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = "raid1",
- [BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = "dup",
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = "raid0",
- [BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = "single",
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = "raid5",
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = "raid6",
-};
-
-static const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type)
-{
- if (type >= BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES)
- return NULL;
-
- return btrfs_raid_type_names[type];
-}
-
enum btrfs_loop_type {
LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT = 0,
LOOP_CACHING_WAIT = 1,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 9c29fdca9075..5bb18ad6433d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 1,
.devs_increment = 2,
.ncopies = 2,
+ .raid_name = "raid10",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 1,
.devs_increment = 2,
.ncopies = 2,
+ .raid_name = "raid1",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 0,
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 2,
+ .raid_name = "dup",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -79,6 +82,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 0,
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 1,
+ .raid_name = "raid0",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -88,6 +92,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 0,
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 1,
+ .raid_name = "single",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 1,
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 2,
+ .raid_name = "raid5",
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -106,9 +112,18 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.tolerated_failures = 2,
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 3,
+ .raid_name = "raid6",
},
};
+const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type)
+{
+ if (type >= BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return btrfs_raid_array[type].raid_name;
+}
+
const u64 btrfs_raid_group[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID10] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10,
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index ef220d541d4b..d6edff847871 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct btrfs_raid_attr {
int tolerated_failures; /* max tolerated fail devs */
int devs_increment; /* ndevs has to be a multiple of this */
int ncopies; /* how many copies to data has */
+ const char raid_name[8];/* name of the raid */
};
extern const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
@@ -563,6 +564,8 @@ static inline enum btrfs_raid_types btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(u64 flags)
return BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE; /* BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SINGLE */
}
+const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type);
+
void btrfs_update_commit_device_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
void btrfs_update_commit_device_bytes_used(struct btrfs_transaction *trans);
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[]
2018-04-25 11:01 [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Anand Jain
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[] Anand Jain
@ 2018-04-25 11:01 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[] Anand Jain
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-04-25 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Add a new member struct btrfs_raid_attr::bg_flag so that
btrfs_raid_array[] can maintain the bit map flag of the raid type,
and so we can kill btrfs_raid_group[].
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index b62559dfb053..2fa063c3ccec 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3525,7 +3525,7 @@ int btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(u64 flags)
for (raid_type = 0; raid_type < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; raid_type++) {
if (raid_type == BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE)
continue;
- if (!(flags & btrfs_raid_group[raid_type]))
+ if (!(flags & btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].bg_flag))
continue;
min_tolerated = min(min_tolerated,
btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 4742734a73d7..19b4e24854ca 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4178,7 +4178,7 @@ static u64 btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
/* First, mask out the RAID levels which aren't possible */
for (raid_type = 0; raid_type < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; raid_type++) {
if (num_devices >= btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].devs_min)
- allowed |= btrfs_raid_group[raid_type];
+ allowed |= btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].bg_flag;
}
allowed &= flags;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 5bb18ad6433d..de3eea8b393e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 2,
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid10",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 2,
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid1",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "dup",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 1,
.raid_name = "raid0",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -93,6 +97,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 1,
.raid_name = "single",
+ .bg_flag = 0,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid5",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -113,6 +119,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.devs_increment = 1,
.ncopies = 3,
.raid_name = "raid6",
+ .bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6,
},
};
@@ -124,16 +131,6 @@ const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type)
return btrfs_raid_array[type].raid_name;
}
-const u64 btrfs_raid_group[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID10] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1,
- [BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0,
- [BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = 0,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6,
-};
-
/*
* Table to convert BTRFS_RAID_* to the error code if minimum number of devices
* condition is not met. Zero means there's no corresponding
@@ -1898,7 +1895,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) {
- if (!(all_avail & btrfs_raid_group[i]))
+ if (!(all_avail & btrfs_raid_array[i].bg_flag))
continue;
if (num_devices < btrfs_raid_array[i].devs_min) {
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index d6edff847871..d9c4c734d854 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -343,11 +343,11 @@ struct btrfs_raid_attr {
int devs_increment; /* ndevs has to be a multiple of this */
int ncopies; /* how many copies to data has */
const char raid_name[8];/* name of the raid */
+ u64 bg_flag; /* block group flag of the raid */
};
extern const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
extern const int btrfs_raid_mindev_error[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
-extern const u64 btrfs_raid_group[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
struct map_lookup {
u64 type;
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[]
2018-04-25 11:01 [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Anand Jain
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[] Anand Jain
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[] Anand Jain
@ 2018-04-25 11:01 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-26 13:01 ` David Sterba
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-04-25 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Add a new member struct btrfs_raid_attr::mindev_error so that
btrfs_raid_array[] can maintain the error code to return if the
minimum numnber of devices required condition is not met while
trying to delete a device in the given raid. And so we can
kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[].
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index de3eea8b393e..14efa98b7183 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid10",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10,
+ .mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid1",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1,
+ .mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "dup",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP,
+ .mindev_error = 0,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -87,6 +90,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 1,
.raid_name = "raid0",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0,
+ .mindev_error = 0,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -98,6 +102,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 1,
.raid_name = "single",
.bg_flag = 0,
+ .mindev_error = 0,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -109,6 +114,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 2,
.raid_name = "raid5",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5,
+ .mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET,
},
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = {
.sub_stripes = 1,
@@ -120,6 +126,7 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
.ncopies = 3,
.raid_name = "raid6",
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6,
+ .mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET,
},
};
@@ -131,21 +138,6 @@ const char *get_raid_name(enum btrfs_raid_types type)
return btrfs_raid_array[type].raid_name;
}
-/*
- * Table to convert BTRFS_RAID_* to the error code if minimum number of devices
- * condition is not met. Zero means there's no corresponding
- * BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_*_NOT_MET value.
- */
-const int btrfs_raid_mindev_error[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID10] = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID1] = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET,
- [BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = 0,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID0] = 0,
- [BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE] = 0,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID5] = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET,
- [BTRFS_RAID_RAID6] = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET,
-};
-
static int init_first_rw_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
static int btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
@@ -1899,7 +1891,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
continue;
if (num_devices < btrfs_raid_array[i].devs_min) {
- int ret = btrfs_raid_mindev_error[i];
+ int ret = btrfs_raid_array[i].mindev_error;
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index d9c4c734d854..cc53a99116aa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -344,10 +344,10 @@ struct btrfs_raid_attr {
int ncopies; /* how many copies to data has */
const char raid_name[8];/* name of the raid */
u64 bg_flag; /* block group flag of the raid */
+ int mindev_error; /* error code if min devs requisite is unmet */
};
extern const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
-extern const int btrfs_raid_mindev_error[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES];
struct map_lookup {
u64 type;
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[]
2018-04-25 11:01 [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Anand Jain
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-04-25 11:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[] Anand Jain
@ 2018-04-25 14:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-26 13:01 ` David Sterba
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-04-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain, linux-btrfs
On 25.04.2018 14:01, Anand Jain wrote:
> Cleanup patches as in the individual change log.
>
> These patches were sent independently as they aren't related as such,
> but as I am updating the 1/3 the 2/3 would endup with conflict. So
> here I am putting all of them together with the conflict fixed at
> my end. And as such there is no change in 2/3 and 3/3 from its v1.
>
> Anand Jain (3):
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[]
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[]
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[]
>
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 20 +------------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 7 +++++--
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[]
2018-04-25 11:01 [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Anand Jain
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-04-25 14:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[] Nikolay Borisov
@ 2018-04-26 13:01 ` David Sterba
2018-04-27 1:14 ` Anand Jain
4 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-04-26 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 07:01:41PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Cleanup patches as in the individual change log.
>
> These patches were sent independently as they aren't related as such,
> but as I am updating the 1/3 the 2/3 would endup with conflict. So
> here I am putting all of them together with the conflict fixed at
> my end. And as such there is no change in 2/3 and 3/3 from its v1.
>
> Anand Jain (3):
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[]
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[]
> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[]
Added to misc-next, thanks. I've reordered the mindev_error before the
raid_name for better struct packing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/3] enhance btrfs_raid_array[]
2018-04-26 13:01 ` David Sterba
@ 2018-04-27 1:14 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-04-27 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba, linux-btrfs
On 04/26/2018 09:01 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 07:01:41PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> Cleanup patches as in the individual change log.
>>
>> These patches were sent independently as they aren't related as such,
>> but as I am updating the 1/3 the 2/3 would endup with conflict. So
>> here I am putting all of them together with the conflict fixed at
>> my end. And as such there is no change in 2/3 and 3/3 from its v1.
>>
>> Anand Jain (3):
>> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_type_names[]
>> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_group[]
>> btrfs: kill btrfs_raid_mindev_error[]
>
> Added to misc-next, thanks.
> I've reordered the mindev_error before the
> raid_name for better struct packing.
Right. Thanks.
-Anand
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread