From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Refactor inode key check into seperate function
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:54:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191209105435.36041-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209105435.36041-1-wqu@suse.com>
Inode key check is not as easy as several lines, and it will be called
in more than one location (INODE_ITEM check and
DIR_ITEM/DIR_INDEX/XATTR_ITEM location key check).
So here refactor such check into check_inode_key().
And add extra checks for XATTR_ITEM.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 6cb49c75c5e1..68dad9ec38dd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -359,6 +359,60 @@ static int check_csum_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
return 0;
}
+/* Inode item error output has the same format as dir_item_err() */
+#define inode_item_err(eb, slot, fmt, ...) \
+ dir_item_err(eb, slot, fmt, __VA_ARGS__)
+
+static int check_inode_key(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
+ int slot)
+{
+ struct btrfs_key item_key;
+ bool is_inode_item;
+
+ btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &item_key, slot);
+ is_inode_item = (item_key.type == BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY);
+
+ /* For XATTR_ITEM, location key should be all 0 */
+ if (item_key.type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY) {
+ if (key->type != 0 || key->objectid != 0 || key->offset != 0)
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if ((key->objectid < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
+ key->objectid > BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID) &&
+ key->objectid != BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_DIR_OBJECTID &&
+ key->objectid != BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID) {
+ if (is_inode_item)
+ generic_err(leaf, slot,
+ "invalid key objectid: has %llu expect %llu or [%llu, %llu] or %llu",
+ key->objectid, BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_DIR_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID);
+ else
+ dir_item_err(leaf, slot,
+"invalid location key objectid: has %llu expect %llu or [%llu, %llu] or %llu",
+ key->objectid, BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_DIR_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID,
+ BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ if (key->offset != 0) {
+ if (is_inode_item)
+ inode_item_err(leaf, slot,
+ "invalid key offset: has %llu expect 0",
+ key->offset);
+ else
+ dir_item_err(leaf, slot,
+ "invalid location key offset:has %llu expect 0",
+ key->offset);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int check_dir_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key, struct btrfs_key *prev_key,
int slot)
@@ -798,25 +852,12 @@ static int check_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
u64 super_gen = btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy);
u32 valid_mask = (S_IFMT | S_ISUID | S_ISGID | S_ISVTX | 0777);
u32 mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = check_inode_key(leaf, key, slot);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- if ((key->objectid < BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
- key->objectid > BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID) &&
- key->objectid != BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_DIR_OBJECTID &&
- key->objectid != BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID) {
- generic_err(leaf, slot,
- "invalid key objectid: has %llu expect %llu or [%llu, %llu] or %llu",
- key->objectid, BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_DIR_OBJECTID,
- BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
- BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID,
- BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID);
- return -EUCLEAN;
- }
- if (key->offset != 0) {
- inode_item_err(leaf, slot,
- "invalid key offset: has %llu expect 0",
- key->offset);
- return -EUCLEAN;
- }
iitem = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_inode_item);
/* Here we use super block generation + 1 to handle log tree */
--
2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 10:54 [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Clean up fs_info parameter from error message wrapper Qu Wenruo
2019-12-09 10:54 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-12-09 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Refactor inode key check into seperate function Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-10 14:42 ` Su Yue
2019-12-11 0:24 ` Qu WenRuo
2019-12-09 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Refactor root key check into separate function Qu Wenruo
2019-12-09 12:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-09 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify location key for DIR_ITEM/DIR_INDEX Qu Wenruo
2019-12-09 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: tree-checker: Clean up fs_info parameter from error message wrapper Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-02 15:04 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191209105435.36041-2-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox