public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	darrick.wong@oracle.com, fdmanana@kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz,
	jthumshirn@suse.de, nborisov@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] iomap: Move lockdep_assert_held() to iomap_dio_rw() calls
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:24:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212222405.oaceuk63cme2mlkz@fiona> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212095044.GD15977@infradead.org>

On  1:50 12/12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 06:30:39PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
> > 
> > Filesystems such as btrfs can perform direct I/O without holding the
> > inode->i_rwsem in some of the cases like writing within i_size.
> 
> How is that safe? 

This (inode_lock release) is only done for writes within i_size.
We only have to safeguard write against truncates, which is done by
inode_dio_wait() call in the truncate sequence (I had mistakenly removed
it in patch 8/8, I shall reinstate that). The commit that introduced this
optimization is 38851cc19adb ("Btrfs: implement unlocked dio write")


> 
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&file_inode(file)->i_rwsem);
> 
> Having the asserts in the callers is pointless.  The assert is inside
> the iomap helper to ensure the expected calling conventions, as the
> code is written under the assumption that we have i_rwsem.

Hmm, conflicting opinions from you and Dave. Anyways, I have removed it
in individual filesystems.

-- 
Goldwyn

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12  0:30 [PATCH 0/8 v5] btrfs direct-io using iomap Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs: Export generic_file_buffered_read() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] iomap: add a filesystem hook for direct I/O bio submission Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: Switch to iomap_dio_rw() for dio Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12  9:56     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-12  9:57       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 10:38         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-12 19:42     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] iomap: Move lockdep_assert_held() to iomap_dio_rw() calls Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 22:24     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2019-12-12 22:46     ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: Remove dio_end_io() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: Wait for extent bits to release page Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: Use iomap_end() instead of btrfs_dio_data Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  9:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12  0:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-12  8:53   ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191212222405.oaceuk63cme2mlkz@fiona \
    --to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox