public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: add a comment describing block-rsvs
Date: Tue,  4 Feb 2020 13:18:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204181856.765916-2-josef@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200204181856.765916-1-josef@toxicpanda.com>

This is a giant comment at the top of block-rsv.c describing generally
how block rsvs work.  It is purely about the block rsv's themselves, and
nothing to do with how the actual reservation system works.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
index d07bd41a7c1e..c3843a0001cb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
@@ -6,6 +6,97 @@
 #include "space-info.h"
 #include "transaction.h"
 
+/*
+ * HOW DO BLOCK RSVS WORK
+ *
+ *   Think of block_rsv's as buckets for logically grouped metadata
+ *   reservations.  Each block_rsv has a ->size and a ->reserved.  ->size is how
+ *   large we want our block rsv to be, ->reserved is how much space is
+ *   currently reserved for this block reserve.
+ *
+ *   ->failfast exists for the truncate case, and is described below.
+ *
+ * NORMAL OPERATION
+ *
+ *   -> Reserve
+ *     Entrance: btrfs_block_rsv_add, btrfs_block_rsv_refill
+ *
+ *     We call into btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() with our bytes, which is
+ *     accounted for in space_info->bytes_may_use, and then add the bytes to
+ *     ->reserved, and ->size in the case of btrfs_block_rsv_add.
+ *
+ *     ->size is an over-estimation of how much we may use for a particular
+ *     operation.
+ *
+ *   -> Use
+ *     Entrance: btrfs_use_block_rsv
+ *
+ *     When we do a btrfs_alloc_tree_block() we call into btrfs_use_block_rsv()
+ *     to determine the appropriate block_rsv to use, and then verify that
+ *     ->reserved has enough space for our tree block allocation.  Once
+ *     successful we subtract fs_info->nodesize from ->reserved.
+ *
+ *   -> Finish
+ *     Entrance: btrfs_block_rsv_release
+ *
+ *     We are finished with our operation, subtract our individual reservation
+ *     from ->size, and then subtract ->size from ->reserved and free up the
+ *     excess if there is any.
+ *
+ *     There is some logic here to refill the delayed refs rsv or the global rsv
+ *     as needed, otherwise the excess is subtracted from
+ *     space_info->bytes_may_use.
+ *
+ * TYPES OF BLOCK RSVS
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_TRANS, BLOCK_RSV_DELOPS, BLOCK_RSV_CHUNK
+ *   These behave normally, as described above, just within the confines of the
+ *   lifetime of their particular operation (transaction for the whole trans
+ *   handle lifetime, for example).
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_GLOBAL
+ *   It is impossible to properly account for all the space that may be required
+ *   to make our extent tree updates.  This block reserve acts as an overflow
+ *   buffer in case our delayed refs rsv does not reserve enough space to update
+ *   the extent tree.
+ *
+ *   We can steal from this in some cases as well, notably on evict() or
+ *   truncate() in order to help users recover from ENOSPC conditions.
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_DELALLOC
+ *   The individual item sizes are determined by the per-inode size
+ *   calculations, which are described with the delalloc code.  This is pretty
+ *   straightforward, it's just the calculation of ->size encodes a lot of
+ *   different items, and thus it gets used when updating inodes, inserting file
+ *   extents, and inserting checksums.
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_DELREFS
+ *   We keep a running tally of how many delayed refs we have on the system.
+ *   We assume each one of these delayed refs are going to use a full
+ *   reservation.  We use the transaction items and pre-reserve space for every
+ *   operation, and use this reservation to refill any gap between ->size and
+ *   ->reserved that may exist.
+ *
+ *   From there it's straightforward, removing a delayed ref means we remove its
+ *   count from ->size and free up reservations as necessary.  Since this is the
+ *   most dynamic block rsv in the system, we will try to refill this block rsv
+ *   first with any excess returned by any other block reserve.
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_EMPTY
+ *   This is the fallback block rsv to make us try to reserve space if we don't
+ *   have a specific bucket for this allocation.  It is mostly used for updating
+ *   the device tree and such, since that is a separate pool we're content to
+ *   just reserve space from the space_info on demand.
+ *
+ * BLOCK_RSV_TEMP
+ *   This is used by things like truncate and iput.  We will temporarily
+ *   allocate a block rsv, set it to some size, and then truncate bytes until we
+ *   have no space left.  With ->failfast set we'll simply return ENOSPC from
+ *   btrfs_use_block_rsv() to signal that we need to unwind and try to make a
+ *   new reservation.  This is because these operations are unbounded, so we
+ *   want to do as much work as we can, and then back off and re-reserve.
+ */
+
 static u64 block_rsv_release_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 				    struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv,
 				    struct btrfs_block_rsv *dest, u64 num_bytes,
-- 
2.24.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-04 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-04 18:18 [PATCH 0/3][v2] Add comments describing how space reservation works Josef Bacik
2020-02-04 18:18 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-02-07 15:11   ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: add a comment describing block-rsvs David Sterba
2020-02-04 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: add a comment describing delalloc space reservation Josef Bacik
2020-02-04 18:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: describe the space reservation system in general Josef Bacik
2020-02-05 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/3][v2] Add comments describing how space reservation works David Sterba
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-03 20:44 [PATCH 0/3] " Josef Bacik
2020-02-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: add a comment describing block-rsvs Josef Bacik
2020-02-04  9:30   ` Qu Wenruo
2020-02-04 10:32     ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200204181856.765916-2-josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox