From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, hch@infradead.org, dsterba@suse.cz,
fdmanana@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Return zero in case of unsuccessful pagecache invalidation before DIO
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:23:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529002319.GQ252930@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528192103.xm45qoxqmkw7i5yl@fiona>
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:21:03PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Filesystems such as btrfs are unable to guarantee page invalidation
> because pages could be locked as a part of the extent. Return zero
Locked for what? filemap_write_and_wait_range should have just cleaned
them off.
> in case a page cache invalidation is unsuccessful so filesystems can
> fallback to buffered I/O. This is similar to
> generic_file_direct_write().
>
> This takes care of the following invalidation warning during btrfs
> mixed buffered and direct I/O using iomap_dio_rw():
>
> Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data
> corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
>
> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index e4addfc58107..215315be6233 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -483,9 +483,15 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> */
> ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> - if (ret)
> - dio_warn_stale_pagecache(iocb->ki_filp);
> - ret = 0;
> + /*
> + * If a page can not be invalidated, return 0 to fall back
> + * to buffered write.
> + */
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -EBUSY)
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out_free_dio;
XFS doesn't fall back to buffered io when directio fails, which means
this will cause a regression there.
Granted mixing write types is bogus...
--D
> + }
>
> if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE && !wait_for_completion &&
> !inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq) {
>
> --
> Goldwyn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 19:21 [PATCH] iomap: Return zero in case of unsuccessful pagecache invalidation before DIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-05-29 0:23 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-05-29 10:55 ` Filipe Manana
2020-05-29 11:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-29 11:50 ` Filipe Manana
2020-05-29 12:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-06-01 15:16 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-06-03 11:23 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 11:32 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 19:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-06-03 19:10 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 19:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-03 21:07 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-06-04 13:55 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529002319.GQ252930@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox