public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: start deprecation of mount option inode_cache
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:50:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200623185032.14983-1-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)

Estimated time of removal of the functionality is 5.11, the option will
be still parsed but not doing anything.

Reasons for deprecation and removal:

- very poor naming choice of the mount option, it's supposed to cache
  and reuse the inode _numbers_, but it sounds a some generic cache for
  inodes

- the only known usecase where this option would make sense is on a
  32bit architecture where inode numbers in one subvolume would be
  exhausted due to 32bit inode::i_ino

- the cache is stored on disk, consumes space, needs to be loaded and
  written back

- new inode number allocation is slower due to lookups into the cache
  (compared to a simple increment which is the default)

- uses the free-space-cache code that is going to be deprecated as well
  in the future

Known problems:

- since 2011, returning EEXIST when there's not enough space in a page
  to store all checksums, see commit 4b9465cb9e38 ("Btrfs: add mount -o
  inode_cache")

Remaining issues:

- if the option was enabled, new inodes created, the option disabled
  again, the cache is still stored on the devices and there's currently
  no way to remove it

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 98fe2a634c70..3f1abbeef66c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -827,6 +827,8 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, char *options,
 			}
 			break;
 		case Opt_inode_cache:
+			btrfs_warn(info,
+	"the 'inode_cache' option is deprecated and will be stop working in 5.11");
 			btrfs_set_pending_and_info(info, INODE_MAP_CACHE,
 					   "enabling inode map caching");
 			break;
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 18:50 David Sterba [this message]
2020-06-23 23:27 ` [PATCH] btrfs: start deprecation of mount option inode_cache Qu Wenruo
2020-06-24 11:00   ` David Sterba
2020-06-24 11:06     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-06-24  7:37 ` Steven Davies
2020-06-24  9:55   ` David Sterba
2020-07-07 17:14 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200623185032.14983-1-dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox