From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH 11/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:42:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810154242.782802-12-josef@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810154242.782802-1-josef@toxicpanda.com>
Our lockdep maps are based on rootid+level, however in some cases we
will lock adjacent blocks on the same level, namely in searching forward
or in split/balance. Because of this lockdep will complain, so we need
a separate subclass to indicate to lockdep that these are different
locks.
lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW
split leaf
lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT
lock right -> BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT
The above graph illustrates the need for this new nesting subclass.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 16 ++++++++--------
fs/btrfs/locking.h | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index a9699232d5bc..ea5412cd0f62 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
left = NULL;
if (left) {
- btrfs_tree_lock(left);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, left,
parent, pslot - 1, &left,
@@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
right = NULL;
if (right) {
- btrfs_tree_lock(right);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
wret = btrfs_cow_block(trans, root, right,
parent, pslot + 1, &right,
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (left) {
u32 left_nr;
- btrfs_tree_lock(left);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
left_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(left);
@@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static noinline int push_nodes_for_insert(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (right) {
u32 right_nr;
- btrfs_tree_lock(right);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
right_nr = btrfs_header_nritems(right);
@@ -3742,7 +3742,7 @@ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
if (IS_ERR(right))
return 1;
- btrfs_tree_lock(right);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(right, BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(right);
free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(right);
@@ -3975,7 +3975,7 @@ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
if (IS_ERR(left))
return 1;
- btrfs_tree_lock(left);
+ __btrfs_tree_lock(left, BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT);
btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(left);
free_space = btrfs_leaf_free_space(left);
@@ -5393,7 +5393,7 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
if (!ret) {
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
- BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
+ BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
path->recurse);
}
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
@@ -5430,7 +5430,7 @@ int btrfs_next_old_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
if (!ret) {
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
__btrfs_tree_read_lock(next,
- BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
+ BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
path->recurse);
}
next_rw_lock = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
index 9e0975aa82b3..f93e3e10ddbd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
@@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
* a subclass for COW'ed blocks so that lockdep doesn't complain.
*/
BTRFS_NESTING_COW,
+
+ /*
+ * Oftentimes we need to lock adjacent nodes on the same level while
+ * still holding the lock on the original node we searched to, such as
+ * for searching forward or for split/balance.
+ *
+ * Because of this we need to indicate to lockdep that this is
+ * acceptable by having a different subclass for each of these
+ * operations.
+ */
+ BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT,
+ BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
};
struct btrfs_path;
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 15:42 [PATCH 00/17] Convert to an rwsem for our tree locking Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] btrfs: drop path before adding new uuid tree entry Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 16:28 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 16:30 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-11 14:35 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 16:45 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] btrfs: do not hold device_list_mutex when closing devices Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 10:53 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-14 14:11 ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 04/17] btrfs: allocate scrub workqueues outside of locks Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:22 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] btrfs: set the correct lockdep class for new nodes Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:25 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:28 ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] btrfs: rename eb->lock_nested to eb->lock_recursed Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] btrfs: introduce path->recurse Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 09/17] btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers Josef Bacik
2020-08-14 14:41 ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW for cow'ing blocks Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 13/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for adding new roots Josef Bacik
2020-08-14 14:45 ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] btrfs: change our extent buffer lock to a rw_semaphore Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] btrfs: remove all of the blocking helpers Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 17/17] btrfs: rip out path->leave_spinning Josef Bacik
2020-08-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 00/17] Convert to an rwsem for our tree locking David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810154242.782802-12-josef@toxicpanda.com \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox