public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:42:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810154242.782802-14-josef@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810154242.782802-1-josef@toxicpanda.com>

If we are splitting a leaf/node, we could do something like the
following

lock(leaf)  BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
  lock(left) BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT + BTRFS_NESTING_COW
    push from leaf -> left
      reset path to point to left
        split left
          allocate new block, lock block BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT

at the new block point we need to have a different nesting level,
because we have already used either BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT or
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT when pushing items from the original leaf into the
adjacent leaves.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c   | 4 ++--
 fs/btrfs/locking.h | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 6b63b3bcacd4..82dac6510a86 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -3473,7 +3473,7 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	btrfs_node_key(c, &disk_key, mid);
 
 	split = alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush(trans, root, 0, &disk_key, level,
-					     c->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL);
+					     c->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT);
 	if (IS_ERR(split))
 		return PTR_ERR(split);
 
@@ -4250,7 +4250,7 @@ static noinline int split_leaf(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		btrfs_item_key(l, &disk_key, mid);
 
 	right = alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush(trans, root, 0, &disk_key, 0,
-					     l->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL);
+					     l->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT);
 	if (IS_ERR(right))
 		return PTR_ERR(right);
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
index 31a87477b889..4f5586fed25a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
 	 */
 	BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT_COW,
 	BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT_COW,
+
+	/*
+	 * When splitting we may push nodes to the left or right, but still use
+	 * the subsequent nodes in our path, keeping our locks on those adjacent
+	 * blocks.  Thus when we go to allocate a new split block we've already
+	 * used up all of our available subclasses, so this subclass exists to
+	 * handle this case where we need to allocate a new split block.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT,
 };
 
 struct btrfs_path;
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-10 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10 15:42 [PATCH 00/17] Convert to an rwsem for our tree locking Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] btrfs: drop path before adding new uuid tree entry Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 16:28   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 16:30     ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-11 14:35     ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 16:45   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] btrfs: do not hold device_list_mutex when closing devices Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 10:53   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-14 14:11   ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 04/17] btrfs: allocate scrub workqueues outside of locks Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:22   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] btrfs: set the correct lockdep class for new nodes Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:25   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers Josef Bacik
2020-08-11 11:28   ` Filipe Manana
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] btrfs: rename eb->lock_nested to eb->lock_recursed Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] btrfs: introduce path->recurse Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 09/17] btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers Josef Bacik
2020-08-14 14:41   ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW for cow'ing blocks Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 11/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for adding new roots Josef Bacik
2020-08-14 14:45   ` David Sterba
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] btrfs: change our extent buffer lock to a rw_semaphore Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] btrfs: remove all of the blocking helpers Josef Bacik
2020-08-10 15:42 ` [PATCH 17/17] btrfs: rip out path->leave_spinning Josef Bacik
2020-08-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 00/17] Convert to an rwsem for our tree locking David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200810154242.782802-14-josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox