From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_find_ordered_sum take btrfs_inode
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:42:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831114249.8360-10-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831114249.8360-1-nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 4 ++--
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 19 +++++++++----------
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 7d5ec71615b8..8f4f2bd6d9b9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
if (page_offsets)
offset = page_offset(bvec.bv_page) + bvec.bv_offset;
- count = btrfs_find_ordered_sum(inode, offset, disk_bytenr,
- csum, nblocks);
+ count = btrfs_find_ordered_sum(BTRFS_I(inode), offset,
+ disk_bytenr, csum, nblocks);
if (count)
goto found;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index d39a0fe4c463..c8a13d143877 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -861,20 +861,21 @@ btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 file_offset)
* try to find a checksum. This is used because we allow pages to
* be reclaimed before their checksum is actually put into the btree
*/
-int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr,
- u8 *sum, int len)
+int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 offset,
+ u64 disk_bytenr, u8 *sum, int len)
{
- struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_ordered_sum *ordered_sum;
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
- struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_tree;
+ struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *tree = &inode->ordered_tree;
unsigned long num_sectors;
unsigned long i;
- u32 sectorsize = btrfs_inode_sectorsize(BTRFS_I(inode));
+ u32 sectorsize = btrfs_inode_sectorsize(inode);
+ const u8 blocksize_bits = inode->vfs_inode.i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
const u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy);
int index = 0;
- ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(BTRFS_I(inode), offset);
+ ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, offset);
if (!ordered)
return 0;
@@ -882,10 +883,8 @@ int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr,
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ordered_sum, &ordered->list, list) {
if (disk_bytenr >= ordered_sum->bytenr &&
disk_bytenr < ordered_sum->bytenr + ordered_sum->len) {
- i = (disk_bytenr - ordered_sum->bytenr) >>
- inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
- num_sectors = ordered_sum->len >>
- inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
+ i = (disk_bytenr - ordered_sum->bytenr) >> blocksize_bits;
+ num_sectors = ordered_sum->len >> blocksize_bits;
num_sectors = min_t(int, len - index, num_sectors - i);
memcpy(sum + index, ordered_sum->sums + i * csum_size,
num_sectors * csum_size);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
index 1610195c6097..6a1d5bf5aee3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
@@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(
u64 len);
void btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
struct list_head *list);
-int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr,
- u8 *sum, int len);
+int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 offset,
+ u64 disk_bytenr, u8 *sum, int len);
u64 btrfs_wait_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 nr,
const u64 range_start, const u64 range_len);
void btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 nr,
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 11:42 [PATCH 00/12] Another batch of inode vs btrfs_inode cleanups Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 01/12] btrfs: Make inode_tree_del take btrfs_inode Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:03 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 02/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 03/12] btrfs: Make ordered extent tracepoint " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:19 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] btrfs: Convert btrfs_inode_sectorsize to " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:20 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_invalidatepage work on btrfs_inode Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 13:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered btrfs_inode-centric Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] btrfs: Make get_extent_skip_holes take btrfs_inode Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 12:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-08-31 13:14 ` [PATCH 09/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_find_ordered_sum " Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] btrfs: Make copy_inline_to_page " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 13:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 11/12] btrfs: Make btrfs_zero_range_check_range_boundary " Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 13:20 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 11:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] btrfs: Make extent_fiemap take btrfs_iode Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-31 13:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-08-31 15:43 ` [PATCH 00/12] Another batch of inode vs btrfs_inode cleanups Josef Bacik
2020-09-01 14:13 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200831114249.8360-10-nborisov@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox