public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: remove the unnecessary parameter @start and @len for check_data_csum()
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 2020 15:52:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908075230.86856-13-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908075230.86856-1-wqu@suse.com>

For check_data_csum(), the page we're using is directly from inode
mapping, thus it has valid page_offset().

We can use (page_offset() + pg_off) to replace @start parameter
completely, while the @len should always be sectorsize.

Since we're here, also add some comment, since there are quite some
confusion in words like start/offset, without explaining whether it's
file_offset or logical bytenr.

This should not affect the existing behavior, as for current sectorsize
== PAGE_SIZE case, @pgoff should always be 0, and len is always
PAGE_SIZE (or sectorsize from the dio read path).

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 9570458aa847..078735aa0f68 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2793,17 +2793,30 @@ void btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(struct page *page, u64 start,
 	btrfs_queue_work(wq, &ordered_extent->work);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Verify the checksum of one sector of uncompressed data.
+ *
+ * @inode:	The inode.
+ * @io_bio:	The btrfs_io_bio which contains the csum.
+ * @icsum:	The csum offset (by number of sectors).
+ * @page:	The page where the data will be written to.
+ * @pgoff:	The offset inside the page.
+ *
+ * The length of such check is always one sector size.
+ */
 static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
-			   int icsum, struct page *page, int pgoff, u64 start,
-			   size_t len)
+			   int icsum, struct page *page, int pgoff)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 	SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, fs_info->csum_shash);
 	char *kaddr;
+	u32 len = fs_info->sectorsize;
 	u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy);
 	u8 *csum_expected;
 	u8 csum[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
 
+	ASSERT(pgoff + len <= PAGE_SIZE);
+
 	csum_expected = ((u8 *)io_bio->csum) + icsum * csum_size;
 
 	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
@@ -2817,8 +2830,8 @@ static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
 	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
 	return 0;
 zeroit:
-	btrfs_print_data_csum_error(BTRFS_I(inode), start, csum, csum_expected,
-				    io_bio->mirror_num);
+	btrfs_print_data_csum_error(BTRFS_I(inode), page_offset(page) + pgoff,
+				    csum, csum_expected, io_bio->mirror_num);
 	if (io_bio->device)
 		btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(io_bio->device,
 					     BTRFS_DEV_STAT_CORRUPTION_ERRS);
@@ -2857,8 +2870,7 @@ static int btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
 	}
 
 	phy_offset >>= inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
-	return check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, phy_offset, page, offset, start,
-			       (size_t)(end - start + 1));
+	return check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, phy_offset, page, offset);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -7545,8 +7557,7 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(struct inode *inode,
 			ASSERT(pgoff < PAGE_SIZE);
 			if (uptodate &&
 			    (!csum || !check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, icsum,
-						       bvec.bv_page, pgoff,
-						       start, sectorsize))) {
+						       bvec.bv_page, pgoff))) {
 				clean_io_failure(fs_info, failure_tree, io_tree,
 						 start, bvec.bv_page,
 						 btrfs_ino(BTRFS_I(inode)),
-- 
2.28.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-08  7:52 [PATCH 00/17] btrfs: add read-only support for subpage sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 01/17] btrfs: extent-io-tests: remove invalid tests Qu Wenruo
2020-09-09 12:26   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-09 13:06     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 02/17] btrfs: calculate inline extent buffer page size based on page size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11  9:56   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 10:13     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 03/17] btrfs: remove the open-code to read disk-key Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:07   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 04/17] btrfs: make btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix to take sector size devided values Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:11   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 10:15     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 05/17] btrfs: don't allow tree block to cross page boundary for subpage support Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:26   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 11:36     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 12:08       ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 06/17] btrfs: handle sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case for extent buffer accessors Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 07/17] btrfs: make csum_tree_block() handle sectorsize smaller than page size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:10   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 08/17] btrfs: refactor how we extract extent buffer from page for alloc_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:14   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 09/17] btrfs: refactor btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:17   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 11:39     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 10/17] btrfs: add assert_spin_locked() for attach_extent_buffer_page() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:22   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 11/17] btrfs: extract the extent buffer verification from btree_readpage_end_io_hook() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 13:00   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-09-11 13:50   ` [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: remove the unnecessary parameter @start and @len for check_data_csum() Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 13/17] btrfs: extent_io: only require sector size alignment for page read Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 13:55   ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-15  1:54     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 14/17] btrfs: make btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook() follow sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-09 17:34   ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-09-10  0:05     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-10 14:26       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 15/17] btrfs: introduce subpage_eb_mapping for extent buffers Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 10:22   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-08 14:24   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 16/17] btrfs: handle extent buffer verification proper for subpage size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  7:52 ` [PATCH 17/17] btrfs: allow RO mount of 4K sector size fs on 64K page system Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08  8:03 ` [PATCH 00/17] btrfs: add read-only support for subpage sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:24 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200908075230.86856-13-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox