From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] btrfs: refactor btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages()
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:17:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dad03832-6de2-5aac-3f67-6b6f2d13cabc@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908075230.86856-10-wqu@suse.com>
On 8.09.20 г. 10:52 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We have attach_extent_buffer_page() and it get utilized in
> btrfs_clone_extent_buffer() and alloc_extent_buffer().
>
> But in btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages() we manually call
> detach_page_private().
>
> This is fine for current code, but if we're going to support subpage
> size, we will do a lot of more work other than just calling
> detach_page_private().
>
> This patch will extract the main work of btrfs_clone_extent_buffer()
Did you mean to type btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages instead of
clone_extent_buffer ?
> into detach_extent_buffer_page() so that later subpage size support can
> put their own code into them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 3c8fe40f67fa..1cb41dab7a1d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -4920,6 +4920,29 @@ int extent_buffer_under_io(const struct extent_buffer *eb)
> test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> }
>
> +static void detach_extent_buffer_page(struct extent_buffer *eb,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + bool mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags);
nit: Now you are performing the atomic op once per page rather than once
per-eb.
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return;
> +
> + if (mapped)
> + spin_lock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> + if (PagePrivate(page) && page->private == (unsigned long)eb) {
> + BUG_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> + BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
> + BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
> + /* We need to make sure we haven't be attached to a new eb. */
> + detach_page_private(page);
> + }
> + if (mapped)
> + spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> + /* One for when we allocated the page */
> + put_page(page);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Release all pages attached to the extent buffer.
> */
> @@ -4927,43 +4950,12 @@ static void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> {
> int i;
> int num_pages;
> - int mapped = !test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, &eb->bflags);
>
> BUG_ON(extent_buffer_under_io(eb));
>
> num_pages = num_extent_pages(eb);
> - for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
> - struct page *page = eb->pages[i];
> -
> - if (!page)
> - continue;
> - if (mapped)
> - spin_lock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> - /*
> - * We do this since we'll remove the pages after we've
> - * removed the eb from the radix tree, so we could race
> - * and have this page now attached to the new eb. So
> - * only clear page_private if it's still connected to
> - * this eb.
> - */
> - if (PagePrivate(page) &&
> - page->private == (unsigned long)eb) {
> - BUG_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags));
> - BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
> - BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
> - /*
> - * We need to make sure we haven't be attached
> - * to a new eb.
> - */
> - detach_page_private(page);
> - }
> -
> - if (mapped)
> - spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
> -
> - /* One for when we allocated the page */
> - put_page(page);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++)
> + detach_extent_buffer_page(eb, eb->pages[i]);
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 7:52 [PATCH 00/17] btrfs: add read-only support for subpage sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 01/17] btrfs: extent-io-tests: remove invalid tests Qu Wenruo
2020-09-09 12:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-09 13:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 02/17] btrfs: calculate inline extent buffer page size based on page size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 9:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 10:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 03/17] btrfs: remove the open-code to read disk-key Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 04/17] btrfs: make btrfs_fs_info::buffer_radix to take sector size devided values Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:11 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 10:15 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 05/17] btrfs: don't allow tree block to cross page boundary for subpage support Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-11 11:36 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 12:08 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 06/17] btrfs: handle sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case for extent buffer accessors Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 07/17] btrfs: make csum_tree_block() handle sectorsize smaller than page size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:10 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 08/17] btrfs: refactor how we extract extent buffer from page for alloc_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:14 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 09/17] btrfs: refactor btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:17 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-09-11 11:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 10/17] btrfs: add assert_spin_locked() for attach_extent_buffer_page() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 11:22 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 11/17] btrfs: extract the extent buffer verification from btree_readpage_end_io_hook() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 13:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 12/17] btrfs: remove the unnecessary parameter @start and @len for check_data_csum() Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 13:50 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 13/17] btrfs: extent_io: only require sector size alignment for page read Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 13:55 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-15 1:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 14/17] btrfs: make btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook() follow sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-09 17:34 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-09-10 0:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-10 14:26 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 15/17] btrfs: introduce subpage_eb_mapping for extent buffers Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 10:22 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-08 14:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 16/17] btrfs: handle extent buffer verification proper for subpage size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 7:52 ` [PATCH 17/17] btrfs: allow RO mount of 4K sector size fs on 64K page system Qu Wenruo
2020-09-08 8:03 ` [PATCH 00/17] btrfs: add read-only support for subpage sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-09-11 10:24 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dad03832-6de2-5aac-3f67-6b6f2d13cabc@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox