From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Remove struct extent_io_ops
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923141947.GP6756@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94e97e0e-7b91-a877-aad1-446e231b27d5@suse.com>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:25:50AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.09.20 г. 23:38 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:34:39PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> > You should really write changelogs for patches that not obviously
> > trivial.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> >
>
>
> I thought this patch was rather self-explanatory - just removing no
> longer used struct and related functions but I guess that's just me
> given I have written the previous 6 patches, so will add a changelog in
> the next iteration. Thanks.
The subject says "remove some struct", but when somebody reads it it's
missing the "..., because ..." part. It becomes clear after reading the
patch that is' not used anymore, but there should be some clue in the
changelog from the beginning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 13:34 [PATCH 0/7] Remove struct extent_io_ops Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Don't call readpage_end_io_hook for the btree inode Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 14:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-21 17:45 ` David Sterba
2020-09-23 6:29 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:10 ` David Sterba
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::readpage_end_io_hook Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 14:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Call submit_bio_hook directly in submit_one_bio Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't opencode is_data_inode in end_bio_extent_readpage Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 20:29 ` David Sterba
2020-09-23 6:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:11 ` David Sterba
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Stop calling submit_bio_hook for data inodes Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Call submit_bio_hook directly for metadata pages Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 15:04 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-21 20:32 ` David Sterba
2020-09-23 6:24 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Remove struct extent_io_ops Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 20:38 ` David Sterba
2020-09-23 6:25 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:19 ` David Sterba [this message]
2020-09-23 14:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 15:09 ` David Sterba
2020-09-21 15:05 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-24 11:35 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200923141947.GP6756@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox