public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Don't call readpage_end_io_hook for the btree inode
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:41:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34abb0f8-729d-aca2-295e-5d11057f4fb3@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918133439.23187-2-nborisov@suse.com>



On 18.09.20 г. 16:34 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Instead of relying on indirect calls to implement metadata buffer
> validation simply check if the inode whose page we are processing equals
> the btree inode. If it does call the necessary function.
> 
> This is an improvement in 2 directions:
> 1. We aren't paying the penalty of indirect calls in a post-speculation
>    attacks world.
> 
> 2. The function is now named more explicitly so it's obvious what's
>    going on
> 
> This is in preparation to removing struct extent_io_ops altogether.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---

So this patch does a bit more than it states because it's also modifying
the readpage_end_io_hook for data nodes as well. Other than that the
code is correct. I'd reword the changelog to the following:

Subject: Call readpage_end_io_hook directly

"
Instead of relying on indirect calls to implement post-read processing
simply distinguish between data/metadata pages and call the
corresponding function. This patch also renames and exports the 2 hooks
giving them more clear names.

This is an improvement in 2 directions:
1. We aren't paying the penalty of indirect calls in a post-speculation
   attacks world.

2. The function is now named more explicitly so it's obvious what's
    going on

 This is in preparation to removing struct extent_io_ops altogether.
"

>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h     | 2 ++
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c   | 8 ++++----
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.h   | 4 +++-
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 ++++++---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c     | 7 +++----
>  5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 4e667b0565e0..0c58d96b9fb3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -2962,6 +2962,8 @@ void btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  u64 btrfs_file_extent_end(const struct btrfs_path *path);
>  
>  /* inode.c */
> +int btrfs_check_csum(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> +		     struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end, int mirror);
>  struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  					   u64 start, u64 len);
>  noinline int can_nocow_extent(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 *len,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 160b485d2cc0..5ad11c38230f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -524,9 +524,9 @@ static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
> -				      u64 phy_offset, struct page *page,
> -				      u64 start, u64 end, int mirror)
> +int btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> +				   struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end,
> +				   int mirror)
>  {
>  	u64 found_start;
>  	int found_level;
> @@ -4639,5 +4639,5 @@ static int btrfs_cleanup_transaction(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  static const struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops = {
>  	/* mandatory callbacks */
>  	.submit_bio_hook = btree_submit_bio_hook,
> -	.readpage_end_io_hook = btree_readpage_end_io_hook,
> +	.readpage_end_io_hook = NULL
>  };
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> index 89b6a709a184..bc2e49246199 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ void btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>  void btrfs_btree_balance_dirty_nodelay(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>  void btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  				 struct btrfs_root *root);
> -
> +int btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> +				   struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end,
> +				   int mirror);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
>  struct btrfs_root *btrfs_alloc_dummy_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index afac70ef0cc5..5e47606f7786 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -2851,9 +2851,12 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  		mirror = io_bio->mirror_num;
>  		if (likely(uptodate)) {
> -			ret = tree->ops->readpage_end_io_hook(io_bio, offset,
> -							      page, start, end,
> -							      mirror);
> +			if (data_inode)
> +				ret = btrfs_check_csum(io_bio, offset, page,
> +						       start, end, mirror);
> +			else
> +				ret = btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer(io_bio,
> +					offset, page, start, end, mirror);
>  			if (ret)
>  				uptodate = 0;
>  			else
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index cb3fdd0798c6..23ac09aa813e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -2817,9 +2817,8 @@ static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
>   * if there's a match, we allow the bio to finish.  If not, the code in
>   * extent_io.c will try to find good copies for us.
>   */
> -static int btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
> -				      u64 phy_offset, struct page *page,
> -				      u64 start, u64 end, int mirror)
> +int btrfs_check_csum(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
> +		     struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end, int mirror)
>  {
>  	size_t offset = start - page_offset(page);
>  	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> @@ -10249,7 +10248,7 @@ static const struct file_operations btrfs_dir_file_operations = {
>  static const struct extent_io_ops btrfs_extent_io_ops = {
>  	/* mandatory callbacks */
>  	.submit_bio_hook = btrfs_submit_bio_hook,
> -	.readpage_end_io_hook = btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook,
> +	.readpage_end_io_hook = NULL
>  };
>  
>  /*
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 13:34 [PATCH 0/7] Remove struct extent_io_ops Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: Don't call readpage_end_io_hook for the btree inode Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:41   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-09-21 14:54   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-21 17:45   ` David Sterba
2020-09-23  6:29     ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:10       ` David Sterba
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::readpage_end_io_hook Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 14:58   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Call submit_bio_hook directly in submit_one_bio Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't opencode is_data_inode in end_bio_extent_readpage Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 20:29   ` David Sterba
2020-09-23  6:23     ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:11       ` David Sterba
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Stop calling submit_bio_hook for data inodes Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Call submit_bio_hook directly for metadata pages Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 15:04   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-21 20:32     ` David Sterba
2020-09-23  6:24       ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-18 13:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Remove struct extent_io_ops Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-21 20:38   ` David Sterba
2020-09-23  6:25     ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 14:19       ` David Sterba
2020-09-23 14:23         ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-09-23 15:09           ` David Sterba
2020-09-21 15:05 ` [PATCH 0/7] " Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-24 11:35 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34abb0f8-729d-aca2-295e-5d11057f4fb3@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox