Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] btrfs: lift rw mount setup from mount and remount
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:50:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123165040.GF8669@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac259f3ceafae5a8bb9b6c554375588705aa55b2.1605736355.git.boris@bur.io>

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:06:16PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> Mounting rw and remounting from ro to rw naturally share invariants and
> functionality which result in a correctly setup rw filesystem. Luckily,
> there is even a strong unity in the code which implements them. In
> mount's open_ctree, these operations mostly happen after an early return
> for ro file systems, and in remount, they happen in a section devoted to
> remounting ro->rw, after some remount specific validation passes.
> 
> However, there are unfortunately a few differences. There are small
> deviations in the order of some of the operations, remount does not
> cleanup orphan inodes in root_tree or fs_tree, remount does not create
> the free space tree, and remount does not handle "one-shot" mount
> options like clear_cache and uuid tree rescan.
> 
> Since we want to add building the free space tree to remount, and since
> it is possible to leak orphans on a filesystem mounted as ro then
> remounted rw

The statement is not specific if the orphans are files or roots. But I
don't agree that a leak is possible, or need a proof of the claim above.

The mount-time orphan cleanup will start early, but otherwise orphan
cleanup is checked and started on dentry lookups (btrfs_lookup_dentry).
Deleted but not clened tree roorts are all found and removed, regardless
of rw or ro->rw mount.

So I wonder if you claim there's a leak just by lack of an explicit call
on the remount path.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 23:06 [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] btrfs: lift rw mount setup from mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-23 16:50   ` David Sterba [this message]
2020-11-30 23:31     ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 18:01       ` David Sterba
2020-11-23 16:57   ` David Sterba
2020-12-01  0:01     ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 17:50       ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] btrfs: cleanup all orphan inodes on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] btrfs: only mark bg->needs_free_space if free space tree is on Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] btrfs: create free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] btrfs: clear oneshot options on mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] btrfs: clear free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 19:49   ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] btrfs: keep sb cache_generation consistent with space_cache Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] btrfs: use sb state to print space_cache mount option Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] btrfs: warn when remount will not change the free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:05   ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] btrfs: remove free space items when disabling space cache v1 Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] btrfs: skip space_cache v1 setup when not using it Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] btrfs: fix lockdep error creating free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-20 21:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes David Sterba
2020-11-30 18:24   ` Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:29     ` David Sterba
2020-11-30 20:33 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201123165040.GF8669@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox