From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130202918.GK6430@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130182416.GA2017125@devbig008.ftw2.facebook.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:24:16AM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:32:22PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:06:15PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > Is this fixing a problem caused by some patches in this series? Because
> > if yes, the fix should be folded there. A standalone patch makese sense
> > in case we can't fold it there (eg. after merging to Linus' tree),
> > otherwise the merged patchsets should be made of complete patches,
> > without fixes-to-fixes. Even if the patchset is in misc-next, fixups are
> > still doable.
>
> The new 'needs_free_space' patch (#3) fixes the bug in this series that
> you caught, so if I understand correctly, I should appropriately fold
> that one into one of the existing patches.
I'll fold it but which one, 1 is only refactoring code and 2 starting
orphan cleanup, so I think it's 2. I have run the test on each commit
with the same test steps as be fore but can't reproduce it (in a VM,
previously it was another box).
> The lockdep issue exists in misc-next as far as I can tell, so I think a
> standalone patch makes sense.
Ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 23:06 [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] btrfs: lift rw mount setup from mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-23 16:50 ` David Sterba
2020-11-30 23:31 ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 18:01 ` David Sterba
2020-11-23 16:57 ` David Sterba
2020-12-01 0:01 ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 17:50 ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] btrfs: cleanup all orphan inodes on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] btrfs: only mark bg->needs_free_space if free space tree is on Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] btrfs: create free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] btrfs: clear oneshot options on mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] btrfs: clear free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 19:49 ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] btrfs: keep sb cache_generation consistent with space_cache Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] btrfs: use sb state to print space_cache mount option Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] btrfs: warn when remount will not change the free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:05 ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] btrfs: remove free space items when disabling space cache v1 Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] btrfs: skip space_cache v1 setup when not using it Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] btrfs: fix lockdep error creating free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-20 21:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes David Sterba
2020-11-30 18:24 ` Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:29 ` David Sterba [this message]
2020-11-30 20:33 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130202918.GK6430@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox