* [PATCH] btrfs: Cleanup btrfs_file_write_iter
@ 2020-12-10 8:38 Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-15 16:35 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2020-12-10 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Nikolay Borisov
First replace all inode instances with a pointer to btrfs_inode. This
removes multiple invocations of the BTRFS_I macro, subsequently remove
2 local variables as they are called only once and simply refer to
them directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 0e41459b8de6..e65223e3510d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1997,9 +1997,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
struct iov_iter *from)
{
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
- struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
- struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
- struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
+ struct btrfs_inode *inode = BTRFS_I(file_inode(file));
ssize_t num_written = 0;
const bool sync = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DSYNC;
@@ -2008,7 +2006,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
* have opened a file as writable, we have to stop this write operation
* to ensure consistency.
*/
- if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR, &fs_info->fs_state))
+ if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR, &inode->root->fs_info->fs_state))
return -EROFS;
if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) &&
@@ -2016,7 +2014,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (sync)
- atomic_inc(&BTRFS_I(inode)->sync_writers);
+ atomic_inc(&inode->sync_writers);
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)
num_written = btrfs_direct_write(iocb, from);
@@ -2028,14 +2026,14 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
* otherwise subsequent syncs to a file that's been synced in this
* transaction will appear to have already occurred.
*/
- spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
- BTRFS_I(inode)->last_sub_trans = root->log_transid;
- spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
+ spin_lock(&inode->lock);
+ inode->last_sub_trans = inode->root->log_transid;
+ spin_unlock(&inode->lock);
if (num_written > 0)
num_written = generic_write_sync(iocb, num_written);
if (sync)
- atomic_dec(&BTRFS_I(inode)->sync_writers);
+ atomic_dec(&inode->sync_writers);
current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
return num_written;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Cleanup btrfs_file_write_iter
2020-12-10 8:38 [PATCH] btrfs: Cleanup btrfs_file_write_iter Nikolay Borisov
@ 2020-12-15 16:35 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2020-12-15 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikolay Borisov; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> First replace all inode instances with a pointer to btrfs_inode. This
> removes multiple invocations of the BTRFS_I macro, subsequently remove
> 2 local variables as they are called only once and simply refer to
> them directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Added to misc-next, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-15 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-10 8:38 [PATCH] btrfs: Cleanup btrfs_file_write_iter Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-15 16:35 ` David Sterba
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox