public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 02/11] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio()
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:52:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211128055259.39249-3-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211128055259.39249-1-wqu@suse.com>

Currently in btrfs_map_bio() we call __btrfs_map_block(), then using the
returned bioc to submit real stripes.

This is fine if we're only going to handle one bio a time.

For the incoming bio split at btrfs_map_bio() time, we want to handle
several differnet bios, thus there we introduce a new helper,
submit_one_mapped_range() to handle the submission part, making it much
easier to make it work in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 3dc1de376966..1d40f4fa64a3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6772,29 +6772,15 @@ static void bioc_error(struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, struct bio *bio, u64 logic
 	}
 }
 
-blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
-			   int mirror_num)
+static int submit_one_mapped_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
+				   struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, u64 map_length,
+				   int mirror_num)
 {
-	struct btrfs_device *dev;
 	struct bio *first_bio = bio;
-	u64 logical = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9;
-	u64 length = 0;
-	u64 map_length;
-	int ret;
-	int dev_nr;
+	u64 logical = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
 	int total_devs;
-	struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = NULL;
-
-	length = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
-	map_length = length;
-
-	btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
-	ret = __btrfs_map_block(fs_info, btrfs_op(bio), logical,
-				&map_length, &bioc, mirror_num, 1);
-	if (ret) {
-		btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
-		return errno_to_blk_status(ret);
-	}
+	int dev_nr;
+	int ret;
 
 	total_devs = bioc->num_stripes;
 	bioc->orig_bio = first_bio;
@@ -6813,18 +6799,19 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
 						    mirror_num, 1);
 		}
 
-		btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
-		return errno_to_blk_status(ret);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (map_length < length) {
+	if (map_length < bio->bi_iter.bi_size) {
 		btrfs_crit(fs_info,
-			   "mapping failed logical %llu bio len %llu len %llu",
-			   logical, length, map_length);
+			   "mapping failed logical %llu bio len %u len %llu",
+			   logical, bio->bi_iter.bi_size, map_length);
 		BUG();
 	}
 
 	for (dev_nr = 0; dev_nr < total_devs; dev_nr++) {
+		struct btrfs_device *dev;
+
 		dev = bioc->stripes[dev_nr].dev;
 		if (!dev || !dev->bdev || test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING,
 						   &dev->dev_state) ||
@@ -6841,6 +6828,34 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
 
 		submit_stripe_bio(bioc, bio, bioc->stripes[dev_nr].physical, dev);
 	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
+			   int mirror_num)
+{
+	u64 logical = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9;
+	u64 length = 0;
+	u64 map_length;
+	int ret;
+	struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = NULL;
+
+	length = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
+	map_length = length;
+
+	btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked(fs_info);
+	ret = __btrfs_map_block(fs_info, btrfs_op(bio), logical,
+				&map_length, &bioc, mirror_num, 1);
+	if (ret) {
+		btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
+		return errno_to_blk_status(ret);
+	}
+
+	ret = submit_one_mapped_range(fs_info, bio, bioc, map_length, mirror_num);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
+		return errno_to_blk_status(ret);
+	}
 	btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info);
 	return BLK_STS_OK;
 }
-- 
2.34.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-28  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28  5:52 [PATCH RFC 00/11] btrfs: split bio at btrfs_map_bio() time Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] btrfs: update an stale comment on btrfs_submit_bio_hook() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] btrfs: move btrfs_bio_wq_end_io() calls into submit_stripe_bio() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio_split() helper Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] btrfs: save bio::bi_iter into btrfs_bio::iter before submitting Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_readpage() to handle split bio properly Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_*_writepage() to handle split biot properly Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] btrfs: allow btrfs_map_bio() to split bio according to chunk stripe boundaries Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] btrfs: remove bio split operations in btrfs_submit_direct() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-30 13:54   ` [btrfs] 675923ac06: BUG:KASAN:use-after-free_in__blk_queue_split kernel test robot
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] btrfs: remove btrfs_bio_ctrl::len_to_stripe_boundary Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] btrfs: temporarily disable RAID56 Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211128055259.39249-3-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox