From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 07/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_*_writepage() to handle split biot properly
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:52:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211128055259.39249-8-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211128055259.39249-1-wqu@suse.com>
There are 3 call sites involved:
- end_bio_extent_writepage()
For data writeback
- end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage()
For subpage metadata writeback
- end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage()
For regular metadata writeback
All those functions share the same modification:
- Remove ASSERT() to non-cloned bios
- Use bio_for_each_segment()
Which can handle both unsplit bio and split biot properly.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 67965faeef47..91013c1dce25 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2827,31 +2827,31 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, u64 start, u64 end)
static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio)
{
int error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
- struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ struct bvec_iter iter;
+ struct bio_vec bvec;
u64 start;
u64 end;
- struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
bool first_bvec = true;
- ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
- bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
- struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+ ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+ __bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+ struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
/* Our read/write should always be sector aligned. */
- if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_offset, sectorsize))
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_offset, sectorsize))
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"partial page write in btrfs with offset %u and length %u",
- bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
- else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, sectorsize))
+ bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
+ else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, sectorsize))
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"incomplete page write with offset %u and length %u",
- bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
+ bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
- start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
- end = start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+ start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+ end = start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
if (first_bvec) {
btrfs_record_physical_zoned(inode, start, bio);
@@ -2860,7 +2860,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio)
end_extent_writepage(page, error, start, end);
- btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec->bv_len);
+ btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec.bv_len);
}
bio_put(bio);
@@ -4475,20 +4475,20 @@ static struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer_nolock(
static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct bio *bio)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
- struct bio_vec *bvec;
- struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+ struct bvec_iter iter;
+ struct bio_vec bvec;
fs_info = btrfs_sb(bio_first_page_all(bio)->mapping->host->i_sb);
ASSERT(fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE);
- ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
- bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
- struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
- u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
- u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+ ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+ __bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+ struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
+ u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+ u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
u64 cur_bytenr = bvec_start;
- ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
+ ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
/* Iterate through all extent buffers in the range */
while (cur_bytenr <= bvec_end) {
@@ -4531,14 +4531,14 @@ static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct bio *bio)
static void end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage(struct bio *bio)
{
- struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ struct bvec_iter iter;
+ struct bio_vec bvec;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int done;
- struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
- ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
- bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
- struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+ ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+ __bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+ struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
BUG_ON(!eb);
--
2.34.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-28 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-28 5:52 [PATCH RFC 00/11] btrfs: split bio at btrfs_map_bio() time Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] btrfs: update an stale comment on btrfs_submit_bio_hook() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] btrfs: move btrfs_bio_wq_end_io() calls into submit_stripe_bio() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio_split() helper Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] btrfs: save bio::bi_iter into btrfs_bio::iter before submitting Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_readpage() to handle split bio properly Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] btrfs: allow btrfs_map_bio() to split bio according to chunk stripe boundaries Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] btrfs: remove bio split operations in btrfs_submit_direct() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-30 13:54 ` [btrfs] 675923ac06: BUG:KASAN:use-after-free_in__blk_queue_split kernel test robot
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] btrfs: remove btrfs_bio_ctrl::len_to_stripe_boundary Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28 5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] btrfs: temporarily disable RAID56 Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211128055259.39249-8-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox