public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 07/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_*_writepage() to handle split biot properly
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:52:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211128055259.39249-8-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211128055259.39249-1-wqu@suse.com>

There are 3 call sites involved:

- end_bio_extent_writepage()
  For data writeback

- end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage()
  For subpage metadata writeback

- end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage()
  For regular metadata writeback

All those functions share the same modification:

- Remove ASSERT() to non-cloned bios
- Use bio_for_each_segment()
  Which can handle both unsplit bio and split biot properly.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 67965faeef47..91013c1dce25 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2827,31 +2827,31 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, u64 start, u64 end)
 static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	int error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bvec_iter iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	u64 start;
 	u64 end;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	bool first_bvec = true;
 
-	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+	ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+	__bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
 		struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 		const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
 
 		/* Our read/write should always be sector aligned. */
-		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_offset, sectorsize))
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_offset, sectorsize))
 			btrfs_err(fs_info,
 		"partial page write in btrfs with offset %u and length %u",
-				  bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
-		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, sectorsize))
+				  bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
+		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, sectorsize))
 			btrfs_info(fs_info,
 		"incomplete page write with offset %u and length %u",
-				   bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
+				   bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
 
-		start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
-		end = start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+		start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+		end = start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
 
 		if (first_bvec) {
 			btrfs_record_physical_zoned(inode, start, bio);
@@ -2860,7 +2860,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio)
 
 		end_extent_writepage(page, error, start, end);
 
-		btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec->bv_len);
+		btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec.bv_len);
 	}
 
 	bio_put(bio);
@@ -4475,20 +4475,20 @@ static struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer_nolock(
 static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
 	fs_info = btrfs_sb(bio_first_page_all(bio)->mapping->host->i_sb);
 	ASSERT(fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE);
 
-	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
-		u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
-		u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+	ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+	__bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
+		u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+		u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
 		u64 cur_bytenr = bvec_start;
 
-		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
+		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
 
 		/* Iterate through all extent buffers in the range */
 		while (cur_bytenr <= bvec_end) {
@@ -4531,14 +4531,14 @@ static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct bio *bio)
 
 static void end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bvec_iter iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct extent_buffer *eb;
 	int done;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
-	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+	ASSERT(btrfs_bio(bio)->iter.bi_size);
+	__bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter, btrfs_bio(bio)->iter) {
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 
 		eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
 		BUG_ON(!eb);
-- 
2.34.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-28  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28  5:52 [PATCH RFC 00/11] btrfs: split bio at btrfs_map_bio() time Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] btrfs: update an stale comment on btrfs_submit_bio_hook() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] btrfs: move btrfs_bio_wq_end_io() calls into submit_stripe_bio() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio_split() helper Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] btrfs: save bio::bi_iter into btrfs_bio::iter before submitting Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_readpage() to handle split bio properly Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] btrfs: allow btrfs_map_bio() to split bio according to chunk stripe boundaries Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] btrfs: remove bio split operations in btrfs_submit_direct() Qu Wenruo
2021-11-30 13:54   ` [btrfs] 675923ac06: BUG:KASAN:use-after-free_in__blk_queue_split kernel test robot
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] btrfs: remove btrfs_bio_ctrl::len_to_stripe_boundary Qu Wenruo
2021-11-28  5:52 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] btrfs: temporarily disable RAID56 Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211128055259.39249-8-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox