From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 21:08:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127153806.vufsbus447s2tdib@riteshh-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127055306.30252-1-wqu@suse.com>
On 22/01/27 01:53PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> There is a long existing bug in btrfs defrag code that it will always
> try to defrag compressed extents, even they are already at max capacity.
>
> This will not reduce the number of extents, but only waste IO/CPU.
>
> The kernel fix is titled:
>
> btrfs: defrag: don't defrag extents which is already at its max capacity
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/257 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/257.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/257
> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/257.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/257 b/tests/btrfs/257
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..326687dc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/257
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 257
> +#
> +# Make sure btrfs defrag ioctl won't defrag compressed extents which are already
> +# at their max capacity.
Haven't really looked into this fstest. But it is a good practice to add the
commit id and the title here for others to easily refer kernel commit.
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 5:53 [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size Qu Wenruo
2022-01-27 11:37 ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 11:44 ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 15:38 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2022-01-27 22:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-01-28 2:56 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-28 3:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-01 15:14 ` David Sterba
2022-02-02 0:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-02 8:46 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220127153806.vufsbus447s2tdib@riteshh-domain \
--to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox