public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:20:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92343b23-cf6c-e138-9cfe-79336cd1bb54@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127153806.vufsbus447s2tdib@riteshh-domain>



On 2022/1/27 23:38, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> On 22/01/27 01:53PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> There is a long existing bug in btrfs defrag code that it will always
>> try to defrag compressed extents, even they are already at max capacity.
>>
>> This will not reduce the number of extents, but only waste IO/CPU.
>>
>> The kernel fix is titled:
>>
>>    btrfs: defrag: don't defrag extents which is already at its max capacity
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/btrfs/257     | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   tests/btrfs/257.out |  2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/257
>>   create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/257.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/257 b/tests/btrfs/257
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..326687dc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/257
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 257
>> +#
>> +# Make sure btrfs defrag ioctl won't defrag compressed extents which are already
>> +# at their max capacity.
>
> Haven't really looked into this fstest. But it is a good practice to add the
> commit id and the title here for others to easily refer kernel commit.

Isn't that already in the commit message?

Thanks,
Qu
>
> -ritesh
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-27  5:53 [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size Qu Wenruo
2022-01-27 11:37 ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 11:44   ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 15:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-27 22:20   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-01-28  2:56     ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-28  3:10       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-01 15:14 ` David Sterba
2022-02-02  0:07   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-02  8:46     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92343b23-cf6c-e138-9cfe-79336cd1bb54@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox