From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:20:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92343b23-cf6c-e138-9cfe-79336cd1bb54@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127153806.vufsbus447s2tdib@riteshh-domain>
On 2022/1/27 23:38, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> On 22/01/27 01:53PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> There is a long existing bug in btrfs defrag code that it will always
>> try to defrag compressed extents, even they are already at max capacity.
>>
>> This will not reduce the number of extents, but only waste IO/CPU.
>>
>> The kernel fix is titled:
>>
>> btrfs: defrag: don't defrag extents which is already at its max capacity
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> tests/btrfs/257 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/btrfs/257.out | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/257
>> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/257.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/257 b/tests/btrfs/257
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..326687dc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/257
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 257
>> +#
>> +# Make sure btrfs defrag ioctl won't defrag compressed extents which are already
>> +# at their max capacity.
>
> Haven't really looked into this fstest. But it is a good practice to add the
> commit id and the title here for others to easily refer kernel commit.
Isn't that already in the commit message?
Thanks,
Qu
>
> -ritesh
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 5:53 [PATCH] btrfs: add test case to verify that btrfs won't waste IO/CPU to defrag compressed extents already at their max size Qu Wenruo
2022-01-27 11:37 ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 11:44 ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-27 15:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-27 22:20 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-01-28 2:56 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-28 3:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-01 15:14 ` David Sterba
2022-02-02 0:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-02-02 8:46 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92343b23-cf6c-e138-9cfe-79336cd1bb54@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox