From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix problem with balance recovery and snap delete
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:47:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220224144717.GV12643@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221162032.GH12643@twin.jikos.cz>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:20:32PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 02:56:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > v1->v2:
> > - reworked the fix based on Filipe's feedback. Instead of just doing all the
> > snapshot delete at mount time simply keep track of any in-progress drops.
> > Then gate relocation on those drops finishing. Once the drops finish we
> > unblock relocation and carry on like normal.
> >
> > --- Original email ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found a problem where we'll try to add refs to blocks that no longer have
> > references because we started a relocation while we had a half deleted snapshot
> > in the file system. This only occurs on a clean mount with a pending snapshot
> > delete in place. I saw this in production but lost the file system before I
> > could test my patch. However I reproduced it locally with some error injection.
> > Without my patch we'd fail to run delayed refs with the warning in the commit
> > message in the first patch, with my patch we mount and can use the file system.
> >
> > The other two patches are just cleanups that i noticed while messing with this
> > code. Thanks,
> >
> > Josef
> >
> > Josef Bacik (3):
> > btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are done
> > btrfs: use btrfs_fs_info for deleting snapshots and cleaner
> > btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info to btrfs_recover_relocation
>
> Added as topic branch to for-next, thanks.
Moved to misc-next, with the clear_and_wake_up_bit fixup.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 19:56 [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix problem with balance recovery and snap delete Josef Bacik
2022-02-18 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are done Josef Bacik
2022-02-21 12:38 ` Filipe Manana
2022-02-24 15:03 ` [btrfs] 0ac06c96a6: BUG:KASAN:use-after-free_in_btrfs_drop_snapshot kernel test robot
2022-02-18 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: use btrfs_fs_info for deleting snapshots and cleaner Josef Bacik
2022-02-21 12:40 ` Filipe Manana
2022-02-18 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: pass btrfs_fs_info to btrfs_recover_relocation Josef Bacik
2022-02-21 12:41 ` Filipe Manana
2022-02-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix problem with balance recovery and snap delete David Sterba
2022-02-24 14:47 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220224144717.GV12643@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox