From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: avoid double clean up when submit_one_bio() failed
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220413134630.GI15609@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <447a2d76-dfff-9efb-09e8-9778ac4a44f2@gmx.com>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 07:32:41AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> On 2022/4/13 04:41, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 08:30:13PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> The commit 1784b7d502a9 ("btrfs: handle csum lookup errors properly on
> >> reads") itself is completely fine, it's our existing code not properly
> >> handling the error from bio submission hook properly.
> >>
> >> This patch will make submit_one_bio() to return void so that the callers
> >> will never be able to do cleanup when bio submission hook fails.
> >>
> >> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.18+
> >
> > BTW stable tags are only for released kernels, if it's still in some rc
> > then Fixes: is appropriate.
>
> The problem is I don't have a good idea on which commit to be fixed.
>
> Commit 1784b7d502a9 ("btrfs: handle csum lookup errors properly on
> reads") is completely fine by itself.
>
> The problem is there for a long long time, but can only be triggered
> with IO errors with that newer commit.
>
> Should we really use that commit? It looks like a scapegoat to me...
I see, so it does not make sense to put Fixes: if it's not clearly
caused by the patch, the text description of the problem and references
to patches that could affect is OK.
Still the stable tag should reflect where the fix applies but 5.18
hasn't been released so either it's a typo or you know roughly which
stable kernels should get the fix (5.15, 5.10, etc).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 12:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: vairous bug fixes related to generic/475 failure with subpage cases Qu Wenruo
2022-04-12 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: avoid double clean up when submit_one_bio() failed Qu Wenruo
2022-04-12 20:41 ` David Sterba
2022-04-12 23:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-13 13:46 ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-04-13 23:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-15 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-15 7:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-15 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-15 7:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-24 23:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-04-12 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: fix the error handling for submit_extent_page() for btrfs_do_readpage() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-12 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: return correct error number for __extent_writepage_io() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-12 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: vairous bug fixes related to generic/475 failure with subpage cases David Sterba
2022-04-14 19:38 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220413134630.GI15609@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox