From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH] generic: test fsync of directory with renamed symlink
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509113243.GA2279159@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509111355.nzbg3e2gp3vykvxa@zlang-mailbox>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:13:55PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:57:49AM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > >
> > > Test that if we fsync a directory, create a symlink inside it, rename
> > > the symlink, fsync again the directory and then power fail, after the
> > > filesystem is mounted again, the symlink exists with the new name and
> > > it has the correct content.
> > >
> > > This currently fails on btrfs, because the symlink ends up empty (which
> > > is illegal on Linux), but it is fixed by kernel commit:
> > >
> > > d0e64a981fd841 ("btrfs: always log symlinks in full mode")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Resending as this was missed on the last update.
> > > No changes, only rebased on the current 'for-next' branch.
> >
> > Zorro,
> >
> > This missed against the last fstests update.
> > Did this patch fell through the cracks, or do you expect me to do something about it?
> >
> > Should I rebase and resend again?
>
> Oh, this patch is in my "still reviewing" list, I remembered I didn't see any
> RVB/ACK for it, did I miss some emails? If so I missed something please feel
> free to tell me :)
There weren't any reviews, which is not uncommon.
In the past, the maintainers (Eryu, Dave) usually reviewed the patches themselves.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > >
> > > tests/generic/690 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/generic/690.out | 2 +
> > > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/generic/690
> > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/690.out
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/690 b/tests/generic/690
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..0bf47dd7
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/690
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test 690
> > > +#
> > > +# Test that if we fsync a directory, create a symlink inside it, rename the
> > > +# symlink, fsync again the directory and then power fail, after the filesystem
> > > +# is mounted again, the symlink exists with the new name and it has the correct
> > > +# content.
> > > +#
> > > +# On btrfs this used to result in the symlink being empty (i_size 0), and it was
> > > +# fixed by kernel commit:
> > > +#
> > > +# d0e64a981fd841 ("btrfs: always log symlinks in full mode")
> > > +#
> > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > +_begin_fstest auto quick log
> > > +
> > > +_cleanup()
> > > +{
> > > + _cleanup_flakey
> > > + cd /
> > > + rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +. ./common/filter
> > > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +
> > > +_supported_fs generic
> > > +_require_scratch
> > > +_require_symlinks
> > > +_require_dm_target flakey
> > > +
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# f2fs doesn't support fs-op level transaction functionality, so it has no way
> > > +# to persist all metadata updates in one transaction. We have to use its mount
> > > +# option "fastboot" so that it triggers a metadata checkpoint to persist all
> > > +# metadata updates that happen before a fsync call. Without this, after the
> > > +# last fsync in the test, the symlink named "baz" will not exist.
> > > +if [ $FSTYP = "f2fs" ]; then
> > > + export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o fastboot $MOUNT_OPTIONS"
> > > +fi
> > > +
> > > +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> > > +_init_flakey
> > > +_mount_flakey
> > > +
> > > +# Create our test directory.
> > > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Commit the current transaction and persist the directory.
> > > +sync
> > > +
> > > +# Create a file in the test directory, so that the next fsync on the directory
> > > +# actually does something (it logs the directory).
> > > +echo -n > $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo
> > > +
> > > +# Fsync the directory.
> > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Now create a symlink inside the test directory.
> > > +ln -s $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar
> > > +
> > > +# Rename the symlink.
> > > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz
> > > +
> > > +# Fsync again the directory.
> > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Simulate a power failure and then mount again the filesystem to replay the
> > > +# journal/log.
> > > +_flakey_drop_and_remount
> > > +
> > > +# The symlink should exist, with the name "baz" and its content must be
> > > +# "$SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo".
> > > +[ -L $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz ] || echo "symlink 'baz' is missing"
> > > +echo "symlink content: $(readlink $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz | _filter_scratch)"
> > > +
> > > +_unmount_flakey
> > > +
> > > +# success, all done
> > > +status=0
> > > +exit
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/690.out b/tests/generic/690.out
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..84be1247
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/690.out
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > > +QA output created by 690
> > > +symlink content: SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 10:57 [Resend PATCH] generic: test fsync of directory with renamed symlink fdmanana
2022-05-09 10:03 ` Filipe Manana
2022-05-09 11:13 ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-09 11:32 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-05-09 13:08 ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-09 12:15 ` David Disseldorp
2022-05-09 12:45 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509113243.GA2279159@falcondesktop \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox