From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH DRAFT] btrfs: RAID56J journal on-disk format draft
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 19:02:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524170234.GW18596@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6679e0b681f9b1a74dfccbe05dcb5b6eb0878f6.1653372729.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:13:47PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This is the draft version of the on-disk format for RAID56J journal.
>
> The overall idea is, we have the following elements:
>
> 1) A fixed header
> Recording things like if the journal is clean or dirty, and how many
> entries it has.
>
> 2) One or at most 127 entries
> Each entry will point to a range of data in the per-device reserved
> range.
>
> 3) Data in the remaining reserved space
>
> The write time and recovery workflow is embedded into the on-disk
> format.
>
> Unfortunately we will not have any optimization for the RAID56J, every
> write will be journaled, no exception.
>
> Furthermore due to current write behavior of RAID56, we always submit a
> full 64K stripe no matter what, we have every limited size for the data
> part (at most 15 64K stripe).
>
> So far, I don't believe we will have a fast RAID56J at all.
Well, that does not sound encouraging. One option discussed in the past
how to fix the write hole was to always do full RMW cycle. Having a "not
fast journal at all" would require a format change and have probably a
comparable performance drop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 6:13 [PATCH DRAFT] btrfs: RAID56J journal on-disk format draft Qu Wenruo
2022-05-24 11:08 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 17:02 ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-05-24 22:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 9:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 9:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 9:06 ` waxhead
2022-05-26 9:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 15:30 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-05-26 16:10 ` David Sterba
2022-06-01 2:06 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-01 2:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 2:25 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-01 2:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 9:07 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-01 9:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 9:56 ` Paul Jones
2022-06-01 10:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 18:49 ` Martin Raiber
2022-06-01 21:37 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-03 9:32 ` Lukas Straub
2022-06-03 9:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 8:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 11:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 18:10 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-07 1:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-07 17:36 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-07 22:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-08 17:26 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-13 2:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-08 15:17 ` Lukas Straub
2022-06-08 17:32 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-01 12:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 14:55 ` Robert Krig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524170234.GW18596@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox