From: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH DRAFT] btrfs: RAID56J journal on-disk format draft
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 10:25:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220601102532.D262.409509F4@e16-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bcadb40-e478-1c56-27fc-ca87e7fae715@suse.com>
Hi,
> On 2022/6/1 10:06, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> This is the draft version of the on-disk format for RAID56J journal.
> >>
> >> The overall idea is, we have the following elements:
> >>
> >> 1) A fixed header
> >> Recording things like if the journal is clean or dirty, and how many
> >> entries it has.
> >>
> >> 2) One or at most 127 entries
> >> Each entry will point to a range of data in the per-device reserved
> >> range.
> >
> > Can we put this journal in a device just like 'mke2fs -O journal_dev'
> > or 'mkfs.xfs -l logdev'?
> >
> > A fast & small journal device may help the performance.
>
> Then that lacks the ability to lose one device.
>
> The journal device must be there no matter what.
>
> Furthermore, this will still need a on-disk format change for a special type of device.
If we save journal on every RAID56 HDD, it will always be very slow,
because journal data is in a different place than normal data, so HDD
seek is always happen?
If we save journal on a device just like 'mke2fs -O journal_dev' or 'mkfs.xfs
-l logdev', then this device just works like NVDIMM? We may not need
RAID56/RAID1 for journal data.
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2022/06/01
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 6:13 [PATCH DRAFT] btrfs: RAID56J journal on-disk format draft Qu Wenruo
2022-05-24 11:08 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 17:02 ` David Sterba
2022-05-24 22:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 9:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 9:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 9:06 ` waxhead
2022-05-26 9:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 15:30 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-05-26 16:10 ` David Sterba
2022-06-01 2:06 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-01 2:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 2:25 ` Wang Yugui [this message]
2022-06-01 2:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 9:07 ` Wang Yugui
2022-06-01 9:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 9:56 ` Paul Jones
2022-06-01 10:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 18:49 ` Martin Raiber
2022-06-01 21:37 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-03 9:32 ` Lukas Straub
2022-06-03 9:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 8:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 11:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-06 18:10 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-07 1:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-07 17:36 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-07 22:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-08 17:26 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-13 2:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-08 15:17 ` Lukas Straub
2022-06-08 17:32 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2022-06-01 12:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-06-01 14:55 ` Robert Krig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220601102532.D262.409509F4@e16-tech.com \
--to=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox