From: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] btrfs: Add lockdep models for the transaction states wait events
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:38:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720233818.3107724-4-iangelak@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220720233818.3107724-1-iangelak@fb.com>
Add a lockdep annotation for the transaction states that have wait
events; 1) TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, 2) TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED, 3)
TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED, and 4) TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED in
fs/btrfs/transaction.c.
With the exception of the lockdep annotation for TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
the transaction thread has to acquire the lockdep maps for the transaction
states as reader after the lockdep map for num_writers is released so that
lockdep does not complain.
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 ++++++
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 5fcdd54994f9..8f86e8d5e810 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
struct lockdep_map btrfs_trans_num_writers_map;
struct lockdep_map btrfs_trans_num_extwriters_map;
+ struct lockdep_map btrfs_state_change_map[4];
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY
spinlock_t ref_verify_lock;
@@ -1178,6 +1179,13 @@ enum {
BTRFS_ROOT_UNFINISHED_DROP,
};
+enum btrfs_lockdep_trans_states {
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED,
+};
+
/*
* Lockdep annotation for wait events.
*
@@ -1216,6 +1224,22 @@ enum {
#define btrfs_lockdep_release(b, lock) \
rwsem_release(&b->lock##_map, _THIS_IP_)
+/*
+ * Macros for the transaction states wait events, similar to the generic wait
+ * event macros.
+ */
+#define btrfs_might_wait_for_state(b, i) \
+ do { \
+ rwsem_acquire(&b->btrfs_state_change_map[i], 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); \
+ rwsem_release(&b->btrfs_state_change_map[i], _THIS_IP_); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_acquire(b, i) \
+ rwsem_acquire_read(&b->btrfs_state_change_map[i], 0, 0, _THIS_IP_)
+
+#define btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(b, i) \
+ rwsem_release(&b->btrfs_state_change_map[i], _THIS_IP_)
+
/* Initialization of the lockdep map */
#define btrfs_lockdep_init_map(b, lock) \
do { \
@@ -1223,6 +1247,14 @@ enum {
lockdep_init_map(&b->lock##_map, #lock, &lock##_key, 0); \
} while (0)
+/* Initialization of the transaction states lockdep maps. */
+#define btrfs_state_lockdep_init_map(b, lock, state) \
+ do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key lock##_key; \
+ lockdep_init_map(&b->btrfs_state_change_map[state], #lock, \
+ &lock##_key, 0); \
+ } while (0)
+
static inline void btrfs_wake_unfinished_drop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
clear_and_wake_up_bit(BTRFS_FS_UNFINISHED_DROPS, &fs_info->flags);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 43330a92e7ae..b2ceaa65eed1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3076,6 +3076,14 @@ void btrfs_init_fs_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_num_writers);
btrfs_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
+ btrfs_state_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_commit_start,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
+ btrfs_state_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_unblocked,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
+ btrfs_state_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_super_committed,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED);
+ btrfs_state_lockdep_init_map(fs_info, btrfs_trans_completed,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->space_info);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index c9751a05c029..f2ee407564da 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ static void wait_current_trans(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
refcount_inc(&cur_trans->use_count);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
+ btrfs_might_wait_for_state(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
wait_event(fs_info->transaction_wait,
cur_trans->state >= TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED ||
TRANS_ABORTED(cur_trans));
@@ -868,6 +869,16 @@ static noinline void wait_for_commit(struct btrfs_transaction *commit,
u64 transid = commit->transid;
bool put = false;
+ /*
+ * At the moment this function is called with min_state either being
+ * TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED or TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED
+ */
+ if (min_state == TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED)
+ btrfs_might_wait_for_state(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED);
+ else
+ btrfs_might_wait_for_state(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED);
+
while (1) {
wait_event(commit->commit_wait, commit->state >= min_state);
if (put)
@@ -1980,6 +1991,7 @@ void btrfs_commit_transaction_async(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
* Wait for the current transaction commit to start and block
* subsequent transaction joins
*/
+ btrfs_might_wait_for_state(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
wait_event(fs_info->transaction_blocked_wait,
cur_trans->state >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START ||
TRANS_ABORTED(cur_trans));
@@ -2137,14 +2149,16 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
ktime_t interval;
ASSERT(refcount_read(&trans->use_count) == 1);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_acquire(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
/* Stop the commit early if ->aborted is set */
if (TRANS_ABORTED(cur_trans)) {
ret = cur_trans->aborted;
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
- return ret;
+ goto lockdep_trans_commit_start_release;
}
+
btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
trans->block_rsv = NULL;
@@ -2160,8 +2174,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
*/
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0);
if (ret) {
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
- return ret;
+ goto lockdep_trans_commit_start_release;
}
}
@@ -2192,8 +2205,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
if (run_it) {
ret = btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(trans);
if (ret) {
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
- return ret;
+ goto lockdep_trans_commit_start_release;
}
}
}
@@ -2209,6 +2221,9 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
if (trans->in_fsync)
want_state = TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED;
+
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
wait_for_commit(cur_trans, want_state);
@@ -2222,6 +2237,8 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START;
wake_up(&fs_info->transaction_blocked_wait);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
if (cur_trans->list.prev != &fs_info->trans_list) {
enum btrfs_trans_state want_state = TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED;
@@ -2323,6 +2340,17 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
wait_event(cur_trans->writer_wait,
atomic_read(&cur_trans->num_writers) == 1);
+ /*
+ * Make lockdep happy by acquiring the state locks after
+ * btrfs_trans_num_writers is released. If we acquired the state locks
+ * before releasing the btrfs_trans_num_writers lock then lockdep would
+ * complain because we did not follow the reverse order unlocking rule.
+ */
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_acquire(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_acquire(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_acquire(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
+
/*
* We've started the commit, clear the flag in case we were triggered to
* do an async commit but somebody else started before the transaction
@@ -2332,6 +2360,8 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
if (TRANS_ABORTED(cur_trans)) {
ret = cur_trans->aborted;
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
goto scrub_continue;
}
/*
@@ -2466,6 +2496,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
wake_up(&fs_info->transaction_wait);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
ret = btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans);
if (ret) {
@@ -2497,6 +2528,8 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
*/
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED;
wake_up(&cur_trans->commit_wait);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED);
btrfs_finish_extent_commit(trans);
@@ -2510,6 +2543,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
*/
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED;
wake_up(&cur_trans->commit_wait);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED);
spin_lock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
list_del_init(&cur_trans->list);
@@ -2538,7 +2572,11 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
unlock_reloc:
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_UNBLOCKED);
scrub_continue:
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_SUPER_COMMITTED);
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info, BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMPLETED);
btrfs_scrub_continue(fs_info);
cleanup_transaction:
btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans);
@@ -2555,6 +2593,11 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
btrfs_lockdep_release(fs_info, btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
btrfs_lockdep_release(fs_info, btrfs_trans_num_writers);
goto cleanup_transaction;
+lockdep_trans_commit_start_release:
+ btrfs_trans_state_lockdep_release(fs_info,
+ BTRFS_LOCKDEP_TRANS_COMMIT_START);
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
+ return ret;
}
/*
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-20 23:38 [PATCH v3 0/6] btrfs: Annotate wait events with lockdep Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-20 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] btrfs: Add a lockdep model for the num_writers wait event Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-21 0:42 ` Wang Yugui
2022-07-21 16:37 ` Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-20 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] btrfs: Add a lockdep model for the num_extwriters " Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-20 23:38 ` Ioannis Angelakopoulos [this message]
2022-07-20 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] btrfs: Add a lockdep model for the pending_ordered " Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-20 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] btrfs: Change the lockdep class of struct inode's invalidate_lock Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-20 23:38 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] btrfs: Add a lockdep model for the ordered extents wait event Ioannis Angelakopoulos
2022-07-22 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] btrfs: Annotate wait events with lockdep Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220720233818.3107724-4-iangelak@fb.com \
--to=iangelak@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox