[PATCH 5.15 072/476] btrfs: fix infinite directory reads

[PATCH 5.15 072/476] btrfs: fix infinite directory reads

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit 9b378f6ad48cfa195ed868db9123c09ee7ec5ea2 upstream.

The readdir implementation currently processes always up to the last index
it finds. This however can result in an infinite loop if the directory has
a large number of entries such that they won't all fit in the given buffer
passed to the readdir callback, that is, dir_emit() returns a non-zero
value. Because in that case readdir() will be called again and if in the
meanwhile new directory entries were added and we still can't put all the
remaining entries in the buffer, we keep repeating this over and over.

The following C program and test script reproduce the problem:

  $ cat /mnt/readdir_prog.c
  #include <sys/types.h>
  #include <dirent.h>
  #include <stdio.h>

  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
    DIR *dir = opendir(".");
    struct dirent *dd;

    while ((dd = readdir(dir))) {
      printf("%s\n", dd->d_name);
      rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE");
      rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name);
    }
    closedir(dir);
  }

  $ gcc -o /mnt/readdir_prog /mnt/readdir_prog.c

  $ cat test.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdi
  MNT=/mnt/sdi

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null
  #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null
  #mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV &> /dev/null

  mount $DEV $MNT

  mkdir $MNT/testdir
  for ((i = 1; i <= 2000; i++)); do
      echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i
  done

  cd $MNT/testdir
  /mnt/readdir_prog

  cd /mnt

  umount $MNT

This behaviour is surprising to applications and it's unlike ext4, xfs,
tmpfs, vfat and other filesystems, which always finish. In this case where
new entries were added due to renames, some file names may be reported
more than once, but this varies according to each filesystem - for example
ext4 never reported the same file more than once while xfs reports the
first 13 file names twice.

So change our readdir implementation to track the last index number when
opendir() is called and then make readdir() never process beyond that
index number. This gives the same behaviour as ext4.

Reported-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ Resolve a conflict due to member changes in 96d89923fa94 ]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <eugeniu.rosca@bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h         |    1 
 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c |    5 +
 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h |    1 
 fs/btrfs/inode.c         |  131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1361,6 +1361,7 @@ struct btrfs_drop_extents_args {
 
 struct btrfs_file_private {
 	void *filldir_buf;
+	u64 last_index;
 };
 
 
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1513,6 +1513,7 @@ int btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(
 }
 
 bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
+				     u64 last_index,
 				     struct list_head *ins_list,
 				     struct list_head *del_list)
 {
@@ -1532,14 +1533,14 @@ bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(str
 
 	mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
 	item = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(delayed_node);
-	while (item) {
+	while (item && item->key.offset <= last_index) {
 		refcount_inc(&item->refs);
 		list_add_tail(&item->readdir_list, ins_list);
 		item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
 	}
 
 	item = __btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(delayed_node);
-	while (item) {
+	while (item && item->key.offset <= last_index) {
 		refcount_inc(&item->refs);
 		list_add_tail(&item->readdir_list, del_list);
 		item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_delayed_inodes(struct
 
 /* Used for readdir() */
 bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
+				     u64 last_index,
 				     struct list_head *ins_list,
 				     struct list_head *del_list);
 void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6122,6 +6122,74 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_lookup(struc
 }
 
 /*
+ * Find the highest existing sequence number in a directory and then set the
+ * in-memory index_cnt variable to the first free sequence number.
+ */
+static int btrfs_set_inode_index_count(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
+{
+	struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
+	struct btrfs_key key, found_key;
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
+	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
+	int ret;
+
+	key.objectid = btrfs_ino(inode);
+	key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
+	key.offset = (u64)-1;
+
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+	/* FIXME: we should be able to handle this */
+	if (ret == 0)
+		goto out;
+	ret = 0;
+
+	if (path->slots[0] == 0) {
+		inode->index_cnt = BTRFS_DIR_START_INDEX;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	path->slots[0]--;
+
+	leaf = path->nodes[0];
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &found_key, path->slots[0]);
+
+	if (found_key.objectid != btrfs_ino(inode) ||
+	    found_key.type != BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY) {
+		inode->index_cnt = BTRFS_DIR_START_INDEX;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	inode->index_cnt = found_key.offset + 1;
+out:
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int btrfs_get_dir_last_index(struct btrfs_inode *dir, u64 *index)
+{
+	if (dir->index_cnt == (u64)-1) {
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(dir);
+		if (ret) {
+			ret = btrfs_set_inode_index_count(dir);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	*index = dir->index_cnt;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
  * All this infrastructure exists because dir_emit can fault, and we are holding
  * the tree lock when doing readdir.  For now just allocate a buffer and copy
  * our information into that, and then dir_emit from the buffer.  This is
@@ -6133,10 +6201,17 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_lookup(struc
 static int btrfs_opendir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	struct btrfs_file_private *private;
+	u64 last_index;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_get_dir_last_index(BTRFS_I(inode), &last_index);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	private = kzalloc(sizeof(struct btrfs_file_private), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!private)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	private->last_index = last_index;
 	private->filldir_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!private->filldir_buf) {
 		kfree(private);
@@ -6205,7 +6280,8 @@ static int btrfs_real_readdir(struct fil
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ins_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&del_list);
-	put = btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(inode, &ins_list, &del_list);
+	put = btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(inode, private->last_index,
+					      &ins_list, &del_list);
 
 again:
 	key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
@@ -6238,6 +6314,8 @@ again:
 			break;
 		if (found_key.offset < ctx->pos)
 			goto next;
+		if (found_key.offset > private->last_index)
+			break;
 		if (btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(&del_list, found_key.offset))
 			goto next;
 		di = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
@@ -6372,57 +6450,6 @@ static int btrfs_update_time(struct inod
 }
 
 /*
- * find the highest existing sequence number in a directory
- * and then set the in-memory index_cnt variable to reflect
- * free sequence numbers
- */
-static int btrfs_set_inode_index_count(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
-{
-	struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
-	struct btrfs_key key, found_key;
-	struct btrfs_path *path;
-	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
-	int ret;
-
-	key.objectid = btrfs_ino(inode);
-	key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
-	key.offset = (u64)-1;
-
-	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
-	if (!path)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out;
-	/* FIXME: we should be able to handle this */
-	if (ret == 0)
-		goto out;
-	ret = 0;
-
-	if (path->slots[0] == 0) {
-		inode->index_cnt = BTRFS_DIR_START_INDEX;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	path->slots[0]--;
-
-	leaf = path->nodes[0];
-	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &found_key, path->slots[0]);
-
-	if (found_key.objectid != btrfs_ino(inode) ||
-	    found_key.type != BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY) {
-		inode->index_cnt = BTRFS_DIR_START_INDEX;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	inode->index_cnt = found_key.offset + 1;
-out:
-	btrfs_free_path(path);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/*
  * helper to find a free sequence number in a given directory.  This current
  * code is very simple, later versions will do smarter things in the btree
  */

[PATCH 5.15 073/476] btrfs: set last dir index to the current last index when opening dir

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit 357950361cbc6d54fb68ed878265c647384684ae upstream.

When opening a directory for reading it, we set the last index where we
stop iteration to the value in struct btrfs_inode::index_cnt. That value
does not match the index of the most recently added directory entry but
it's instead the index number that will be assigned the next directory
entry.

This means that if after the call to opendir(3) new directory entries are
added, a readdir(3) call will return the first new directory entry. This
is fine because POSIX says the following [1]:

  "If a file is removed from or added to the directory after the most
   recent call to opendir() or rewinddir(), whether a subsequent call to
   readdir() returns an entry for that file is unspecified."

For example for the test script from commit 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix
infinite directory reads"), where we have 2000 files in a directory, ext4
doesn't return any new directory entry after opendir(3), while xfs returns
the first 13 new directory entries added after the opendir(3) call.

If we move to a shorter example with an empty directory when opendir(3) is
called, and 2 files added to the directory after the opendir(3) call, then
readdir(3) on btrfs will return the first file, ext4 and xfs return the 2
files (but in a different order). A test program for this, reported by
Ian Johnson, is the following:

   #include <dirent.h>
   #include <stdio.h>

   int main(void) {
     DIR *dir = opendir("test");

     FILE *file;
     file = fopen("test/1", "w");
     fwrite("1", 1, 1, file);
     fclose(file);

     file = fopen("test/2", "w");
     fwrite("2", 1, 1, file);
     fclose(file);

     struct dirent *entry;
     while ((entry = readdir(dir))) {
        printf("%s\n", entry->d_name);
     }
     closedir(dir);
     return 0;
   }

To make this less odd, change the behaviour to never return new entries
that were added after the opendir(3) call. This is done by setting the
last_index field of the struct btrfs_file_private attached to the
directory's file handle with a value matching btrfs_inode::index_cnt
minus 1, since that value always matches the index of the next new
directory entry and not the index of the most recently added entry.

[1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904875/functions/readdir_r.html

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YR1P0S.NGASEG570GJ8@ianjohnson.dev/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <eugeniu.rosca@bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6184,7 +6184,8 @@ static int btrfs_get_dir_last_index(stru
 		}
 	}
 
-	*index = dir->index_cnt;
+	/* index_cnt is the index number of next new entry, so decrement it. */
+	*index = dir->index_cnt - 1;
 
 	return 0;
 }

[PATCH 5.15 074/476] btrfs: refresh dir last index during a rewinddir(3) call

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit e60aa5da14d01fed8411202dbe4adf6c44bd2a57 upstream.

When opening a directory we find what's the index of its last entry and
then store it in the directory's file handle private data (struct
btrfs_file_private::last_index), so that in the case new directory entries
are added to a directory after an opendir(3) call we don't end up in an
infinite loop (see commit 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory
reads")) when calling readdir(3).

However once rewinddir(3) is called, POSIX states [1] that any new
directory entries added after the previous opendir(3) call, must be
returned by subsequent calls to readdir(3):

  "The rewinddir() function shall reset the position of the directory
   stream to which dirp refers to the beginning of the directory.
   It shall also cause the directory stream to refer to the current
   state of the corresponding directory, as a call to opendir() would
   have done."

We currently don't refresh the last_index field of the struct
btrfs_file_private associated to the directory, so after a rewinddir(3)
we are not returning any new entries added after the opendir(3) call.

Fix this by finding the current last index of the directory when llseek
is called against the directory.

This can be reproduced by the following C program provided by Ian Johnson:

   #include <dirent.h>
   #include <stdio.h>

   int main(void) {
     DIR *dir = opendir("test");

     FILE *file;
     file = fopen("test/1", "w");
     fwrite("1", 1, 1, file);
     fclose(file);

     file = fopen("test/2", "w");
     fwrite("2", 1, 1, file);
     fclose(file);

     rewinddir(dir);

     struct dirent *entry;
     while ((entry = readdir(dir))) {
        printf("%s\n", entry->d_name);
     }
     closedir(dir);
     return 0;
   }

Reported-by: Ian Johnson <ian@ianjohnson.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YR1P0S.NGASEG570GJ8@ianjohnson.dev/
Fixes: 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <eugeniu.rosca@bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6222,6 +6222,19 @@ static int btrfs_opendir(struct inode *i
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static loff_t btrfs_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
+{
+	struct btrfs_file_private *private = file->private_data;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_get_dir_last_index(BTRFS_I(file_inode(file)),
+				       &private->last_index);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
+}
+
 struct dir_entry {
 	u64 ino;
 	u64 offset;
@@ -11087,7 +11100,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations btr
 };
 
 static const struct file_operations btrfs_dir_file_operations = {
-	.llseek		= generic_file_llseek,
+	.llseek		= btrfs_dir_llseek,
 	.read		= generic_read_dir,
 	.iterate_shared	= btrfs_real_readdir,
 	.open		= btrfs_opendir,

[PATCH 5.15 075/476] btrfs: fix race between reading a directory and adding entries to it

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit 8e7f82deb0c0386a03b62e30082574347f8b57d5 upstream.

When opening a directory (opendir(3)) or rewinding it (rewinddir(3)), we
are not holding the directory's inode locked, and this can result in later
attempting to add two entries to the directory with the same index number,
resulting in a transaction abort, with -EEXIST (-17), when inserting the
second delayed dir index. This results in a trace like the following:

  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: BTRFS error (device dm-3): err add delayed dir index item(name: cockroach-stderr.log) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 5, inode id: 4539217, errno: -17)
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1504!
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 7159 Comm: cockroach Not tainted 6.4.15-200.fc38.x86_64 #1
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Hardware name: ASUS ESC500 G3/P9D WS, BIOS 2402 06/27/2018
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RIP: 0010:btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Code: eb dd 48 (...)
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RSP: 0000:ffffa9980e0fbb28 EFLAGS: 00010282
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b10b8f4a3c0 RCX: 0000000000000000
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b177ec21540 RDI: ffff8b177ec21540
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: RBP: ffff8b110cf80888 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa9980e0fb938
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff86146508 R12: 0000000000000014
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: R13: ffff8b1131ae5b40 R14: ffff8b10b8f4a418 R15: 00000000ffffffef
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: FS:  00007fb14a7fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff8b177ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: CR2: 000000c00143d000 CR3: 00000001b3b4e002 CR4: 00000000001706f0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel: Call Trace:
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  <TASK>
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? die+0x36/0x90
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? do_trap+0xda/0x100
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index+0x1da/0x260
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x200/0x280
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  btrfs_add_link+0xab/0x4f0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? ktime_get_real_ts64+0x47/0xe0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  btrfs_create_new_inode+0x7cd/0xa80
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  btrfs_symlink+0x190/0x4d0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? schedule+0x5e/0xd0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? __d_lookup+0x7e/0xc0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  vfs_symlink+0x148/0x1e0
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  do_symlinkat+0x130/0x140
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  __x64_sys_symlinkat+0x3d/0x50
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2b/0x40
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
  Sep 11 22:34:59 myhostname kernel:  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc

The race leading to the problem happens like this:

1) Directory inode X is loaded into memory, its ->index_cnt field is
   initialized to (u64)-1 (at btrfs_alloc_inode());

2) Task A is adding a new file to directory X, holding its vfs inode lock,
   and calls btrfs_set_inode_index() to get an index number for the entry.

   Because the inode's index_cnt field is set to (u64)-1 it calls
   btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count() which fails because no dir index
   entries were added yet to the delayed inode and then it calls
   btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). This functions finds the last dir index
   key and then sets index_cnt to that index value + 1. It found that the
   last index key has an offset of 100. However before it assigns a value
   of 101 to index_cnt...

3) Task B calls opendir(3), ending up at btrfs_opendir(), where the VFS
   lock for inode X is not taken, so it calls btrfs_get_dir_last_index()
   and sees index_cnt still with a value of (u64)-1. Because of that it
   calls btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count() which fails since no dir
   index entries were added to the delayed inode yet, and then it also
   calls btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). This also finds that the last
   index key has an offset of 100, and before it assigns the value 101
   to the index_cnt field of inode X...

4) Task A assigns a value of 101 to index_cnt. And then the code flow
   goes to btrfs_set_inode_index() where it increments index_cnt from
   101 to 102. Task A then creates a delayed dir index entry with a
   sequence number of 101 and adds it to the delayed inode;

5) Task B assigns 101 to the index_cnt field of inode X;

6) At some later point when someone tries to add a new entry to the
   directory, btrfs_set_inode_index() will return 101 again and shortly
   after an attempt to add another delayed dir index key with index
   number 101 will fail with -EEXIST resulting in a transaction abort.

Fix this by locking the inode at btrfs_get_dir_last_index(), which is only
only used when opening a directory or attempting to lseek on it.

Reported-by: ken <ken@bllue.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE6xmH+Lp=Q=E61bU+v9eWX8gYfLvu6jLYxjxjFpo3zHVPR0EQ@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+d13490c82ad5353c779d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
Fixes: 9b378f6ad48c ("btrfs: fix infinite directory reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <eugeniu.rosca@bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6173,21 +6173,24 @@ out:
 
 static int btrfs_get_dir_last_index(struct btrfs_inode *dir, u64 *index)
 {
-	if (dir->index_cnt == (u64)-1) {
-		int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
+	btrfs_inode_lock(&dir->vfs_inode, 0);
+	if (dir->index_cnt == (u64)-1) {
 		ret = btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(dir);
 		if (ret) {
 			ret = btrfs_set_inode_index_count(dir);
 			if (ret)
-				return ret;
+				goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
 	/* index_cnt is the index number of next new entry, so decrement it. */
 	*index = dir->index_cnt - 1;
+out:
+	btrfs_inode_unlock(&dir->vfs_inode, 0);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*