* Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
2026-04-09 8:11 [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time ZhengYuan Huang
@ 2026-04-09 9:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-04-09 9:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-04-12 3:29 ` kernel test robot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-04-09 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang, dsterba, clm, zheng.yan
Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6, zzzccc427
在 2026/4/9 17:41, ZhengYuan Huang 写道:
>
> [CAUSE]
> The old btrfs_verify_level_key() path rejected tree blocks with
> nritems == 0 whenever the parent check provided a first key.
> Commit 947a629988f1 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into
> validate_extent_buffer()") moved the parentness checks into the read-time
> validation path, but it dropped that guard. This lets an empty non-root
> tree block pass read-time validation even though slot 0 must exist if the
> parent provides a first key.
Wait for a second, there is still the nritems == 0 check inside
btrfs_verify_level_key().
It looks like there is a missing link.
Is the btrfs_buffer_uptodate() call inside read_block_for_search() not
passing the correct check structure?
Thanks,
Qu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
2026-04-09 9:09 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-04-09 9:38 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-04-09 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang, dsterba, clm, zheng.yan
Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6, zzzccc427
在 2026/4/9 18:39, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2026/4/9 17:41, ZhengYuan Huang 写道:
>>
>> [CAUSE]
>> The old btrfs_verify_level_key() path rejected tree blocks with
>> nritems == 0 whenever the parent check provided a first key.
>> Commit 947a629988f1 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into
>> validate_extent_buffer()") moved the parentness checks into the read-time
>> validation path, but it dropped that guard. This lets an empty non-root
>> tree block pass read-time validation even though slot 0 must exist if the
>> parent provides a first key.
>
> Wait for a second, there is still the nritems == 0 check inside
> btrfs_verify_level_key().
>
> It looks like there is a missing link.
>
> Is the btrfs_buffer_uptodate() call inside read_block_for_search() not
> passing the correct check structure?
And if you can provide the fuzzed image for each of your fix/report, it
will help a lot.
It will not only provide a reliable way to test, but also allows
reviewer to verify if the root cause is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
2026-04-09 8:11 [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time ZhengYuan Huang
2026-04-09 9:09 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-04-12 3:29 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-12 4:07 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-12 4:53 ` kernel test robot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-04-12 3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang, dsterba, clm, zheng.yan
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6,
zzzccc427, ZhengYuan Huang
Hi ZhengYuan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kdave/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc7 next-20260410]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/ZhengYuan-Huang/btrfs-reject-empty-non-root-tree-blocks-at-read-time/20260412-051345
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260409081140.3400650-1-gality369%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
config: arm-randconfig-002-20260412 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604121109.U7Y29jQ1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604121109.U7Y29jQ1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604121109.U7Y29jQ1-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c: In function 'btrfs_validate_extent_buffer':
>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:431:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
431 | goto out;
| ^~~~
vim +/out +431 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
355
356 /* Do basic extent buffer checks at read time */
357 int btrfs_validate_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
358 const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check)
359 {
360 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
361 u64 found_start;
362 const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size;
363 u8 found_level;
364 u8 result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
365 const u8 *header_csum;
366 int ret = 0;
367 const bool ignore_csum = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, IGNOREMETACSUMS);
368
369 ASSERT(check);
370
371 found_start = btrfs_header_bytenr(eb);
372 if (unlikely(found_start != eb->start)) {
373 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info,
374 "bad tree block start, mirror %u want %llu have %llu",
375 eb->read_mirror, eb->start, found_start);
376 return -EIO;
377 }
378 if (unlikely(check_tree_block_fsid(eb))) {
379 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info, "bad fsid on logical %llu mirror %u",
380 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
381 return -EIO;
382 }
383 found_level = btrfs_header_level(eb);
384 if (unlikely(found_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL)) {
385 btrfs_err(fs_info,
386 "bad tree block level, mirror %u level %d on logical %llu",
387 eb->read_mirror, btrfs_header_level(eb), eb->start);
388 return -EIO;
389 }
390
391 csum_tree_block(eb, result);
392 header_csum = folio_address(eb->folios[0]) +
393 get_eb_offset_in_folio(eb, offsetof(struct btrfs_header, csum));
394
395 if (memcmp(result, header_csum, csum_size) != 0) {
396 btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
397 "checksum verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " found " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " level %d%s",
398 eb->start, eb->read_mirror,
399 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, header_csum),
400 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, result),
401 btrfs_header_level(eb),
402 ignore_csum ? ", ignored" : "");
403 if (unlikely(!ignore_csum))
404 return -EUCLEAN;
405 }
406
407 if (unlikely(found_level != check->level)) {
408 btrfs_err(fs_info,
409 "level verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %u found %u",
410 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->level, found_level);
411 return -EIO;
412 }
413 if (unlikely(check->transid &&
414 btrfs_header_generation(eb) != check->transid)) {
415 btrfs_err_rl(eb->fs_info,
416 "parent transid verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %llu found %llu",
417 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->transid,
418 btrfs_header_generation(eb));
419 return -EIO;
420 }
421 if (check->has_first_key) {
422 const struct btrfs_key *expect_key = &check->first_key;
423 struct btrfs_key found_key;
424
425 /* We have @first_key, so this @eb must have at least one item. */
426 if (unlikely(btrfs_header_nritems(eb) == 0)) {
427 btrfs_err(fs_info,
428 "invalid tree nritems, bytenr=%llu nritems=0 expect >0",
429 eb->start);
430 ret = -EUCLEAN;
> 431 goto out;
432 }
433
434 if (found_level)
435 btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
436 else
437 btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
438 if (unlikely(btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(expect_key, &found_key))) {
439 btrfs_err(fs_info,
440 "tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=%llu parent_transid=%llu key expected=(%llu,%u,%llu) has=(%llu,%u,%llu)",
441 eb->start, check->transid,
442 expect_key->objectid,
443 expect_key->type, expect_key->offset,
444 found_key.objectid, found_key.type,
445 found_key.offset);
446 return -EUCLEAN;
447 }
448 }
449 if (check->owner_root) {
450 ret = btrfs_check_eb_owner(eb, check->owner_root);
451 if (ret < 0)
452 return ret;
453 }
454
455 /* If this is a leaf block and it is corrupt, just return -EIO. */
456 if (found_level == 0 && btrfs_check_leaf(eb))
457 ret = -EIO;
458
459 if (found_level > 0 && btrfs_check_node(eb))
460 ret = -EIO;
461
462 if (ret)
463 btrfs_err(fs_info,
464 "read time tree block corruption detected on logical %llu mirror %u",
465 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
466 return ret;
467 }
468
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
2026-04-09 8:11 [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time ZhengYuan Huang
2026-04-09 9:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-04-12 3:29 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-04-12 4:07 ` kernel test robot
2026-04-12 4:53 ` kernel test robot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-04-12 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang, dsterba, clm, zheng.yan
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990,
r33s3n6, zzzccc427, ZhengYuan Huang
Hi ZhengYuan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kdave/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc7 next-20260410]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/ZhengYuan-Huang/btrfs-reject-empty-non-root-tree-blocks-at-read-time/20260412-051345
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260409081140.3400650-1-gality369%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604120628.G64NL6IJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604120628.G64NL6IJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604120628.G64NL6IJ-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:431:9: error: use of undeclared label 'out'
431 | goto out;
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/out +431 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
355
356 /* Do basic extent buffer checks at read time */
357 int btrfs_validate_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
358 const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check)
359 {
360 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
361 u64 found_start;
362 const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size;
363 u8 found_level;
364 u8 result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
365 const u8 *header_csum;
366 int ret = 0;
367 const bool ignore_csum = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, IGNOREMETACSUMS);
368
369 ASSERT(check);
370
371 found_start = btrfs_header_bytenr(eb);
372 if (unlikely(found_start != eb->start)) {
373 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info,
374 "bad tree block start, mirror %u want %llu have %llu",
375 eb->read_mirror, eb->start, found_start);
376 return -EIO;
377 }
378 if (unlikely(check_tree_block_fsid(eb))) {
379 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info, "bad fsid on logical %llu mirror %u",
380 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
381 return -EIO;
382 }
383 found_level = btrfs_header_level(eb);
384 if (unlikely(found_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL)) {
385 btrfs_err(fs_info,
386 "bad tree block level, mirror %u level %d on logical %llu",
387 eb->read_mirror, btrfs_header_level(eb), eb->start);
388 return -EIO;
389 }
390
391 csum_tree_block(eb, result);
392 header_csum = folio_address(eb->folios[0]) +
393 get_eb_offset_in_folio(eb, offsetof(struct btrfs_header, csum));
394
395 if (memcmp(result, header_csum, csum_size) != 0) {
396 btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
397 "checksum verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " found " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " level %d%s",
398 eb->start, eb->read_mirror,
399 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, header_csum),
400 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, result),
401 btrfs_header_level(eb),
402 ignore_csum ? ", ignored" : "");
403 if (unlikely(!ignore_csum))
404 return -EUCLEAN;
405 }
406
407 if (unlikely(found_level != check->level)) {
408 btrfs_err(fs_info,
409 "level verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %u found %u",
410 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->level, found_level);
411 return -EIO;
412 }
413 if (unlikely(check->transid &&
414 btrfs_header_generation(eb) != check->transid)) {
415 btrfs_err_rl(eb->fs_info,
416 "parent transid verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %llu found %llu",
417 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->transid,
418 btrfs_header_generation(eb));
419 return -EIO;
420 }
421 if (check->has_first_key) {
422 const struct btrfs_key *expect_key = &check->first_key;
423 struct btrfs_key found_key;
424
425 /* We have @first_key, so this @eb must have at least one item. */
426 if (unlikely(btrfs_header_nritems(eb) == 0)) {
427 btrfs_err(fs_info,
428 "invalid tree nritems, bytenr=%llu nritems=0 expect >0",
429 eb->start);
430 ret = -EUCLEAN;
> 431 goto out;
432 }
433
434 if (found_level)
435 btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
436 else
437 btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
438 if (unlikely(btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(expect_key, &found_key))) {
439 btrfs_err(fs_info,
440 "tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=%llu parent_transid=%llu key expected=(%llu,%u,%llu) has=(%llu,%u,%llu)",
441 eb->start, check->transid,
442 expect_key->objectid,
443 expect_key->type, expect_key->offset,
444 found_key.objectid, found_key.type,
445 found_key.offset);
446 return -EUCLEAN;
447 }
448 }
449 if (check->owner_root) {
450 ret = btrfs_check_eb_owner(eb, check->owner_root);
451 if (ret < 0)
452 return ret;
453 }
454
455 /* If this is a leaf block and it is corrupt, just return -EIO. */
456 if (found_level == 0 && btrfs_check_leaf(eb))
457 ret = -EIO;
458
459 if (found_level > 0 && btrfs_check_node(eb))
460 ret = -EIO;
461
462 if (ret)
463 btrfs_err(fs_info,
464 "read time tree block corruption detected on logical %llu mirror %u",
465 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
466 return ret;
467 }
468
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
2026-04-09 8:11 [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time ZhengYuan Huang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-04-12 4:07 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-04-12 4:53 ` kernel test robot
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-04-12 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZhengYuan Huang, dsterba, clm, zheng.yan
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, r33s3n6,
zzzccc427, ZhengYuan Huang
Hi ZhengYuan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kdave/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc7 next-20260410]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/ZhengYuan-Huang/btrfs-reject-empty-non-root-tree-blocks-at-read-time/20260412-051345
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260409081140.3400650-1-gality369%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject empty non-root tree blocks at read time
config: i386-randconfig-141-20260412 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604121228.ciXtbZT6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
smatch: v0.5.0-9004-gb810ac53
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260412/202604121228.ciXtbZT6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604121228.ciXtbZT6-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:431:9: error: use of undeclared label 'out'
431 | goto out;
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/out +431 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
355
356 /* Do basic extent buffer checks at read time */
357 int btrfs_validate_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
358 const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check)
359 {
360 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
361 u64 found_start;
362 const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size;
363 u8 found_level;
364 u8 result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
365 const u8 *header_csum;
366 int ret = 0;
367 const bool ignore_csum = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, IGNOREMETACSUMS);
368
369 ASSERT(check);
370
371 found_start = btrfs_header_bytenr(eb);
372 if (unlikely(found_start != eb->start)) {
373 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info,
374 "bad tree block start, mirror %u want %llu have %llu",
375 eb->read_mirror, eb->start, found_start);
376 return -EIO;
377 }
378 if (unlikely(check_tree_block_fsid(eb))) {
379 btrfs_err_rl(fs_info, "bad fsid on logical %llu mirror %u",
380 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
381 return -EIO;
382 }
383 found_level = btrfs_header_level(eb);
384 if (unlikely(found_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL)) {
385 btrfs_err(fs_info,
386 "bad tree block level, mirror %u level %d on logical %llu",
387 eb->read_mirror, btrfs_header_level(eb), eb->start);
388 return -EIO;
389 }
390
391 csum_tree_block(eb, result);
392 header_csum = folio_address(eb->folios[0]) +
393 get_eb_offset_in_folio(eb, offsetof(struct btrfs_header, csum));
394
395 if (memcmp(result, header_csum, csum_size) != 0) {
396 btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
397 "checksum verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " found " BTRFS_CSUM_FMT " level %d%s",
398 eb->start, eb->read_mirror,
399 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, header_csum),
400 BTRFS_CSUM_FMT_VALUE(csum_size, result),
401 btrfs_header_level(eb),
402 ignore_csum ? ", ignored" : "");
403 if (unlikely(!ignore_csum))
404 return -EUCLEAN;
405 }
406
407 if (unlikely(found_level != check->level)) {
408 btrfs_err(fs_info,
409 "level verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %u found %u",
410 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->level, found_level);
411 return -EIO;
412 }
413 if (unlikely(check->transid &&
414 btrfs_header_generation(eb) != check->transid)) {
415 btrfs_err_rl(eb->fs_info,
416 "parent transid verify failed on logical %llu mirror %u wanted %llu found %llu",
417 eb->start, eb->read_mirror, check->transid,
418 btrfs_header_generation(eb));
419 return -EIO;
420 }
421 if (check->has_first_key) {
422 const struct btrfs_key *expect_key = &check->first_key;
423 struct btrfs_key found_key;
424
425 /* We have @first_key, so this @eb must have at least one item. */
426 if (unlikely(btrfs_header_nritems(eb) == 0)) {
427 btrfs_err(fs_info,
428 "invalid tree nritems, bytenr=%llu nritems=0 expect >0",
429 eb->start);
430 ret = -EUCLEAN;
> 431 goto out;
432 }
433
434 if (found_level)
435 btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
436 else
437 btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
438 if (unlikely(btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(expect_key, &found_key))) {
439 btrfs_err(fs_info,
440 "tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=%llu parent_transid=%llu key expected=(%llu,%u,%llu) has=(%llu,%u,%llu)",
441 eb->start, check->transid,
442 expect_key->objectid,
443 expect_key->type, expect_key->offset,
444 found_key.objectid, found_key.type,
445 found_key.offset);
446 return -EUCLEAN;
447 }
448 }
449 if (check->owner_root) {
450 ret = btrfs_check_eb_owner(eb, check->owner_root);
451 if (ret < 0)
452 return ret;
453 }
454
455 /* If this is a leaf block and it is corrupt, just return -EIO. */
456 if (found_level == 0 && btrfs_check_leaf(eb))
457 ret = -EIO;
458
459 if (found_level > 0 && btrfs_check_node(eb))
460 ret = -EIO;
461
462 if (ret)
463 btrfs_err(fs_info,
464 "read time tree block corruption detected on logical %llu mirror %u",
465 eb->start, eb->read_mirror);
466 return ret;
467 }
468
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread