* [PATCH] btrfs: fix root-in-trans fast-path ordering
@ 2026-05-06 14:20 Cen Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Cen Zhang @ 2026-05-06 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clm, dsterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, Cen Zhang
btrfs_record_root_in_trans() has a lockless fast path for shareable
roots. It skips reloc_mutex when root->last_trans matches the current
transaction and BTRFS_ROOT_IN_TRANS_SETUP is clear.
The writer side publishes that state in two phases: it sets
IN_TRANS_SETUP before updating root->last_trans, then clears the bit
after btrfs_init_reloc_root() finishes. However, the reader-side
smp_rmb() is before both loads, so it does not order the last_trans load
against the later bit test. A reader can observe the new last_trans value
while missing the setup bit and return before the relocation-root setup
is complete.
Read root->last_trans first, then issue the read barrier before testing
IN_TRANS_SETUP. Also use clear_bit_unlock() for the writer's final clear
and test_bit_acquire() for the successful fast path, so the lockless
return observes the setup done before the bit was cleared.
Fixes: 7585717f304f ("Btrfs: fix relocation races")
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 8dd77c4..ac9ffa8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -454,12 +454,12 @@ static int record_root_in_trans(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
*
* When this is zero, they can trust root->last_trans and fly
* through btrfs_record_root_in_trans without having to take the
- * lock. smp_wmb() makes sure that all the writes above are
- * done before we pop in the zero below
+ * lock. smp_wmb() makes sure readers that see the last_trans
+ * update also see IN_TRANS_SETUP set, and clear_bit_unlock()
+ * publishes the relocation setup before we clear the bit.
*/
ret = btrfs_init_reloc_root(trans, root);
- smp_mb__before_atomic();
- clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_TRANS_SETUP, &root->state);
+ clear_bit_unlock(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_TRANS_SETUP, &root->state);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -497,10 +497,12 @@ int btrfs_record_root_in_trans(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* see record_root_in_trans for comments about IN_TRANS_SETUP usage
* and barriers
*/
- smp_rmb();
- if (btrfs_get_root_last_trans(root) == trans->transid &&
- !test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_TRANS_SETUP, &root->state))
- return 0;
+ if (btrfs_get_root_last_trans(root) == trans->transid) {
+ /* Order the last_trans load before testing IN_TRANS_SETUP. */
+ smp_rmb();
+ if (!test_bit_acquire(BTRFS_ROOT_IN_TRANS_SETUP, &root->state))
+ return 0;
+ }
mutex_lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
ret = record_root_in_trans(trans, root, 0);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-06 14:20 [PATCH] btrfs: fix root-in-trans fast-path ordering Cen Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox