From: "Yan Zheng" <yanzheng@21cn.com>
To: "Chris Samuel" <chris@csamuel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiple device usage
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:33:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d0408630812290433r7f2bb07cue3239c8acf958bb3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812292232.08037.chris@csamuel.org>
2008/12/29 Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 5:45:42 pm Chris Samuel wrote:
>
>> I'll add two questions that're not answered by the Wiki too.. :-)
>
> Looking at the source implies to me:
>
>> 1) If you add a second disk to an existing btrfs filesystem, can you get it
>> to set it up as a RAID-1 arrangement rather than just rebalancing the
>> metadata and then striping ?
>
> No, you can't, the data stripe numbers seem to be set at mkfs time.
>
> The rebalancing code does appear (from a naive read of the code) to be able to
> rebalance over stripes, but I have no idea if the disk format currently
> supports changing that on the fly.
>
The rebalancing moves data/metadata to newly created chunks. If there
are two devices, the new chunks will be set up as RAID-1 by default.
>> 2) With the concerns that people have about SSD reliability (hi Val :-) !)
>> would it make sense to set up two equal sized partitions on the SSD and use
>> RAID-1 across them, or can you tell btrfs to keep multiple copies of the
>> data, a la ZFS ?
>
> Again it would appear that you need to have two partitions and that btrfs
> cannot (at present) keep multiple data stripes on the same partition.
>
Yes. I think this is due to performance reason. Changing the code to
support data duplication in single spindle configuration is easy.
Regards
Yan Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-29 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 23:15 multiple device usage devzero
2008-12-27 2:44 ` Yan Zheng
2008-12-27 14:12 ` Roland
2008-12-28 13:26 ` yanhai zhu
2008-12-29 10:49 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2008-12-29 12:31 ` Roland
2008-12-29 12:35 ` Yan Zheng
2008-12-30 21:43 ` Chris Mason
2008-12-27 6:45 ` Chris Samuel
2008-12-29 11:32 ` Chris Samuel
2008-12-29 12:33 ` Yan Zheng [this message]
2008-12-29 12:52 ` Chris Samuel
2008-12-29 15:16 ` Yan Zheng
2008-12-30 21:25 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-01 1:02 ` Chris Samuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d0408630812290433r7f2bb07cue3239c8acf958bb3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yanzheng@21cn.com \
--cc=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox