From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fixes for handling of split direct I/O bios
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:49:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46203a49-0fde-aa5c-e92e-da0f1dd48885@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324160628.1572613-1-hch@lst.de>
On 3/24/22 12:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series fixes two problems in the direct I/O code where the
> file_offset field in the dio_private structure is used in a context where
> we really need the file_offset for the given low-level bios and not for
> the bio submitted by the iomap direct I/O as recorded in the dio_private
> structure. To do so we need a new file_offset in the btrfs_dio
> structure.
>
> Found by code inspection as part of my bio cleanups.
>
> Diffstat:
> extent_io.c | 1 +
> inode.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> volumes.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
I'm pretty new and don't know much about the criteria for cc'ing stable,
but arguably this makes the check_data_csum() error message not lie
about the start offset in such cases and it seems like a very low risk
improvement to me... might it be worth adding a Fixes: tag / might this
be a reasonable fix for stable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 16:06 fixes for handling of split direct I/O bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix direct I/O read repair for split bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 14:43 ` David Sterba
2022-03-30 22:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-30 23:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-31 0:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix direct I/O writes for split bios on zoned devices Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-24 16:49 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2022-03-24 16:57 ` fixes for handling of split direct I/O bios Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-25 9:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-03-29 8:00 ` Naohiro Aota
2022-04-08 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-12 19:43 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46203a49-0fde-aa5c-e92e-da0f1dd48885@dorminy.me \
--to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox