* New perf results
@ 2009-11-16 22:26 Steven Pratt
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Steven Pratt @ 2009-11-16 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
New performance results have been uploaded for recent runs, including
the nodatasum option and a refresh of other file systems on current kernel.
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html
No big surprises here, with the possible exception of the impact of
csums. For example 128 thread sequential read increased from about
380MB/sec to 630MB/sec by skipping checksums. This happened even though
we were only using about 40% cpu in the normal case. So, even though we
are not CPU bound, the overhead of checksums introduces some major
performance penalties.
Chris, are most of your runs on Nehelam based systems? I know we had
some different results on some tests and wonder if this is one of the
causes. Not sure when/if I can move up to a newer system.
Also some updates to the single disk system as well, although I am
lagging getting all the runs in on that box.
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/single-disk/History/History.html
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-11-16 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-16 22:26 New perf results Steven Pratt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox