Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label
@ 2011-09-01  8:47 Jeff Liu
  2011-09-01  9:00 ` Hugo Mills
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2011-09-01  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: chris.mason

Hello,

I'd like to introduce a new ioctl to set file system label.
With this feature, we can execute `btrfs filesystem label [label] 
[path]` through btrfs tools to set or change the label.

  Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>

---
  fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    6 ++++++
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 03912c5..2889b5e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1259,6 +1259,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
  };


+struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
+    /* label length in bytes */
+    __u32 len;
+    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
+};
+
  /*
   * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
   * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file and 
dir in
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 970977a..9e01628 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -268,6 +268,41 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file 
*file, int __user *arg)
      return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
  }

+static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void __user 
*arg)
+{
+    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block = &(root->fs_info->super_copy);
+    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
+    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+
+    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+        return -EPERM;
+
+    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
+        return -EROFS;
+
+    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
+    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
+        return PTR_ERR(label_args);
+
+    if (label_args->len >= sizeof(label_args->label))
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
+    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+    if (IS_ERR(trans))
+        return PTR_ERR(trans);
+
+    if (snprintf(super_block->label, BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE, "%s",
+             label_args->label) != label_args->len)
+        return -EFAULT;
+
+    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
+
+    kfree(label_args);
+    return 0;
+}
+
  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void __user 
*arg)
  {
      struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
@@ -2876,6 +2911,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
          return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
      case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
          return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
+    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
+        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
      case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
          return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
      case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
index ad1ea78..1e0ca2a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
@@ -248,4 +248,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
                   struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
  #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
                     struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
+#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
+                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)
  #endif
-- 
1.7.4.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label
  2011-09-01  8:47 [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label Jeff Liu
@ 2011-09-01  9:00 ` Hugo Mills
  2011-09-01  9:18   ` Jeff Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Mills @ 2011-09-01  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Liu; +Cc: linux-btrfs, chris.mason

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4393 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:47:47PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to introduce a new ioctl to set file system label.
> With this feature, we can execute `btrfs filesystem label [label]
> [path]` through btrfs tools to set or change the label.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    6 ++++++
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 03912c5..2889b5e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -1259,6 +1259,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
>  };
> 
> 
> +struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
> +    /* label length in bytes */
> +    __u32 len;
> +    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
> +};

   Why do we need to provide a length here? Simply force a zero byte
at the end of the string when you copy it into kernel space, and then
use strcpy(). Then you have no need to test for length at all.

>  /*
>   * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
>   * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file
> and dir in
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 970977a..9e01628 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,41 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file
> *file, int __user *arg)
>      return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
>  }
> 
> +static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void
> __user *arg)
> +{
> +    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block = &(root->fs_info->super_copy);
> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
> +    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> +
> +    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +        return -EPERM;
> +
> +    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
> +        return -EROFS;
> +
> +    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
> +    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
> +        return PTR_ERR(label_args);
> +
> +    if (label_args->len >= sizeof(label_args->label))
> +        return -EINVAL;

   Memory leak... you're not freeing label_args

> +    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> +    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
> +    if (IS_ERR(trans))
> +        return PTR_ERR(trans);

   and here -- and you're leaving the mutex locked

> +    if (snprintf(super_block->label, BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE, "%s",
> +             label_args->label) != label_args->len)
> +        return -EFAULT;

   and here -- plus the transaction is still running

> +    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
> +    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> +
> +    kfree(label_args);
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void
> __user *arg)
>  {
>      struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
> @@ -2876,6 +2911,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>          return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
>      case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
>          return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
> +    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
> +        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
>      case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
>          return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
>      case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> index ad1ea78..1e0ca2a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> @@ -248,4 +248,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
>                   struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
>  #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
>                     struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
> +                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)

   Could you use an unassigned number from [1], and update the wiki
page, please? (The page only went up yesterday, but it's been needed
for a while).

>  #endif

   Will there be a userspace patch for this along shortly?

   Hugo.

[1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Development_notes.2C_please_read

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
    --- You can't expect a boy to be depraved until he's gone to ---     
                             a good school.                              

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label
  2011-09-01  9:00 ` Hugo Mills
@ 2011-09-01  9:18   ` Jeff Liu
  2011-09-01  9:32     ` Hugo Mills
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2011-09-01  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hugo Mills, linux-btrfs, chris.mason

Hi Hugo,

On 09/01/2011 05:00 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:47:47PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to introduce a new ioctl to set file system label.
>> With this feature, we can execute `btrfs filesystem label [label]
>> [path]` through btrfs tools to set or change the label.
>>
>>   Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    6 ++++++
>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> index 03912c5..2889b5e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
>>   };
>>
>>
>> +struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
>> +    /* label length in bytes */
>> +    __u32 len;
>> +    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
>> +};
>     Why do we need to provide a length here? Simply force a zero byte
> at the end of the string when you copy it into kernel space, and then
> use strcpy(). Then you have no need to test for length at all.
At first, I am afraid if an evil user may input an unexpected label 
string with huge bytes to consume memory.
>>   /*
>>    * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
>>    * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file
>> and dir in
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 970977a..9e01628 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -268,6 +268,41 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file
>> *file, int __user *arg)
>>       return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
>>   }
>>
>> +static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void
>> __user *arg)
>> +{
>> +    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block =&(root->fs_info->super_copy);
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
>> +    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>> +
>> +    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> +        return -EPERM;
>> +
>> +    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
>> +        return -EROFS;
>> +
>> +    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
>> +    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(label_args);
>> +
>> +    if (label_args->len>= sizeof(label_args->label))
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>     Memory leak... you're not freeing label_args
>> +    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
>> +    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(trans))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(trans);
>     and here -- and you're leaving the mutex locked
>
>> +    if (snprintf(super_block->label, BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE, "%s",
>> +             label_args->label) != label_args->len)
>> +        return -EFAULT;
>     and here -- plus the transaction is still running
Sorry for my stupid mistake and thanks for pointing those out!
>> +    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
>> +    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
>> +
>> +    kfree(label_args);
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void
>> __user *arg)
>>   {
>>       struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
>> @@ -2876,6 +2911,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>>           return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
>>       case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
>>           return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
>> +    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
>> +        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
>>       case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
>>           return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
>>       case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>> index ad1ea78..1e0ca2a 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>> @@ -248,4 +248,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
>>                    struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
>>   #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
>>                      struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
>> +                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)
>     Could you use an unassigned number from [1], and update the wiki
> page, please? (The page only went up yesterday, but it's been needed
> for a while).
Ok, looks number 5 is free. :)
I'll update the wiki later.


Regards,
-Jeff
>>   #endif
>     Will there be a userspace patch for this along shortly?
>
>     Hugo.
>
> [1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Development_notes.2C_please_read
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label
  2011-09-01  9:18   ` Jeff Liu
@ 2011-09-01  9:32     ` Hugo Mills
  2011-09-01 11:48       ` [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label V2 Jeff Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Mills @ 2011-09-01  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Liu; +Cc: linux-btrfs, chris.mason

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5661 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:18:38PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Hugo,
> 
> On 09/01/2011 05:00 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:47:47PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I'd like to introduce a new ioctl to set file system label.
> >>With this feature, we can execute `btrfs filesystem label [label]
> >>[path]` through btrfs tools to set or change the label.
> >>
> >>  Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    6 ++++++
> >>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
> >>  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>index 03912c5..2889b5e 100644
> >>--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>@@ -1259,6 +1259,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
> >>  };
> >>
> >>
> >>+struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
> >>+    /* label length in bytes */
> >>+    __u32 len;
> >>+    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
> >>+};
> >    Why do we need to provide a length here? Simply force a zero byte
> >at the end of the string when you copy it into kernel space, and then
> >use strcpy(). Then you have no need to test for length at all.
> At first, I am afraid if an evil user may input an unexpected label
> string with huge bytes to consume memory.

   That's why you force a known 0 byte at the end of the string when
you do the copy. (See below) Note also that the evil user can't
consume more than sizeof(btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args) anyway, because
that's how much you're memdup()ing. The only issue is dealing with an
unterminated string... which you can fix by explicitly terminating it.

> >>  /*
> >>   * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
> >>   * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file
> >>and dir in
> >>diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> >>index 970977a..9e01628 100644
> >>--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> >>+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> >>@@ -268,6 +268,41 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file
> >>*file, int __user *arg)
> >>      return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
> >>  }
> >>
> >>+static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void
> >>__user *arg)
> >>+{
> >>+    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block =&(root->fs_info->super_copy);
> >>+    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
> >>+    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> >>+
> >>+    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> >>+        return -EPERM;
> >>+
> >>+    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
> >>+        return -EROFS;
> >>+
> >>+    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
> >>+    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
> >>+        return PTR_ERR(label_args);

         label_args->label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE-1] = 0;

   This guarantees that the string is no longer than
BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE-1 bytes long.

> >>+    if (label_args->len>= sizeof(label_args->label))
> >>+        return -EINVAL;

   Having ensured that the string is no longer than our buffers, we
don't need this.

> >    Memory leak... you're not freeing label_args
> >>+    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> >>+    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
> >>+    if (IS_ERR(trans))
> >>+        return PTR_ERR(trans);
> >    and here -- and you're leaving the mutex locked
> >
> >>+    if (snprintf(super_block->label, BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE, "%s",
> >>+             label_args->label) != label_args->len)

   It's now safe to use strcpy() here, since we know that the string
*must* be zero terminated at or before BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE.

> >>+        return -EFAULT;
> >    and here -- plus the transaction is still running
> Sorry for my stupid mistake and thanks for pointing those out!
> >>+    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
> >>+    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> >>+
> >>+    kfree(label_args);
> >>+    return 0;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void
> >>__user *arg)
> >>  {
> >>      struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
> >>@@ -2876,6 +2911,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> >>          return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
> >>      case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
> >>          return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
> >>+    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
> >>+        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
> >>      case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
> >>          return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
> >>      case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
> >>diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> >>index ad1ea78..1e0ca2a 100644
> >>--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> >>+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> >>@@ -248,4 +248,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
> >>                   struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
> >>  #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
> >>                     struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
> >>+#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
> >>+                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)
> >    Could you use an unassigned number from [1], and update the wiki
> >page, please? (The page only went up yesterday, but it's been needed
> >for a while).
> Ok, looks number 5 is free. :)
> I'll update the wiki later.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> -Jeff
> >>  #endif
> >    Will there be a userspace patch for this along shortly?
> >
> >    Hugo.
> >
> >[1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Development_notes.2C_please_read
> >
> 

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
       --- He's playing Schubert.  I think Schubert is losing. ---       

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label V2
  2011-09-01  9:32     ` Hugo Mills
@ 2011-09-01 11:48       ` Jeff Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2011-09-01 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hugo Mills; +Cc: linux-btrfs, chris.mason

Thanks again for your nice  comments!
The wiki update is in progress.
Btw, is it make sense to improve the "struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args" 
to retrieve the label info through BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO?

Would you please review the revised version?

  Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>

---
  fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    4 ++++
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 03912c5..a4669f0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1259,6 +1259,10 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
  };


+struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
+    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
+};
+
  /*
   * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
   * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file and 
dir in
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 970977a..c872e88 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -268,6 +268,40 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file 
*file, int __user *arg)
      return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
  }

+static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void __user 
*arg)
+{
+    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block = &(root->fs_info->super_copy);
+    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
+    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+    int ret;
+
+    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+        return -EPERM;
+
+    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
+        return -EROFS;
+
+    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
+    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
+        return PTR_ERR(label_args);
+
+    label_args->label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
+
+    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
+    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+    if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+        ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
+        goto out_unlock;
+    }
+    strcpy(super_block->label, label_args->label);
+    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+
+out_unlock:
+    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
+    kfree(label_args);
+    return 0;
+}
+
  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void __user 
*arg)
  {
      struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
@@ -2876,6 +2910,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
          return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
      case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
          return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
+    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
+        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
      case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
          return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
      case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
index ad1ea78..cc3e33b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
@@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
                     struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
  #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
                     struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
+#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
+                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)
  /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
   * use by applications that know how to avoid the
   * resulting deadlocks
-- 
1.7.4.1

On 09/01/2011 05:32 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:18:38PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Hi Hugo,
>>
>> On 09/01/2011 05:00 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:47:47PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to introduce a new ioctl to set file system label.
>>>> With this feature, we can execute `btrfs filesystem label [label]
>>>> [path]` through btrfs tools to set or change the label.
>>>>
>>>>   Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    6 ++++++
>>>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.h |    2 ++
>>>>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> index 03912c5..2889b5e 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>>>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,12 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args {
>>>> +    /* label length in bytes */
>>>> +    __u32 len;
>>>> +    char label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE];
>>>> +};
>>>     Why do we need to provide a length here? Simply force a zero byte
>>> at the end of the string when you copy it into kernel space, and then
>>> use strcpy(). Then you have no need to test for length at all.
>> At first, I am afraid if an evil user may input an unexpected label
>> string with huge bytes to consume memory.
>     That's why you force a known 0 byte at the end of the string when
> you do the copy. (See below) Note also that the evil user can't
> consume more than sizeof(btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args) anyway, because
> that's how much you're memdup()ing. The only issue is dealing with an
> unterminated string... which you can fix by explicitly terminating it.
>
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * inode items have the data typically returned from stat and store other
>>>>    * info about object characteristics.  There is one for every file
>>>> and dir in
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> index 970977a..9e01628 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>>>> @@ -268,6 +268,41 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_getversion(struct file
>>>> *file, int __user *arg)
>>>>       return put_user(inode->i_generation, arg);
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> +static int btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(struct btrfs_root *root, void
>>>> __user *arg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct btrfs_super_block *super_block =&(root->fs_info->super_copy);
>>>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args *label_args;
>>>> +    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>>>> +        return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
>>>> +        return -EROFS;
>>>> +
>>>> +    label_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*label_args));
>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(label_args))
>>>> +        return PTR_ERR(label_args);
>           label_args->label[BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE-1] = 0;
>
>     This guarantees that the string is no longer than
> BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE-1 bytes long.
>
>>>> +    if (label_args->len>= sizeof(label_args->label))
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>     Having ensured that the string is no longer than our buffers, we
> don't need this.
>
>>>     Memory leak... you're not freeing label_args
>>>> +    mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
>>>> +    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(trans))
>>>> +        return PTR_ERR(trans);
>>>     and here -- and you're leaving the mutex locked
>>>
>>>> +    if (snprintf(super_block->label, BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE, "%s",
>>>> +             label_args->label) != label_args->len)
>     It's now safe to use strcpy() here, since we know that the string
> *must* be zero terminated at or before BTRFS_LABEL_SIZE.
>
>>>> +        return -EFAULT;
>>>     and here -- plus the transaction is still running
>> Sorry for my stupid mistake and thanks for pointing those out!
>>>> +    btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
>>>> +    mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> +    kfree(label_args);
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(struct file *file, void
>>>> __user *arg)
>>>>   {
>>>>       struct btrfs_root *root = fdentry(file)->d_sb->s_fs_info;
>>>> @@ -2876,6 +2911,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>>>>           return btrfs_ioctl_fs_info(root, argp);
>>>>       case BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO:
>>>>           return btrfs_ioctl_dev_info(root, argp);
>>>> +    case BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL:
>>>> +        return btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(root, argp);
>>>>       case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
>>>>           return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
>>>>       case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>>>> index ad1ea78..1e0ca2a 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
>>>> @@ -248,4 +248,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
>>>>                    struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_info_args)
>>>>   #define BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 31, \
>>>>                      struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args)
>>>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FS_SETLABEL _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 32, \
>>>> +                   struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_label_args)
>>>     Could you use an unassigned number from [1], and update the wiki
>>> page, please? (The page only went up yesterday, but it's been needed
>>> for a while).
>> Ok, looks number 5 is free. :)
>> I'll update the wiki later.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Jeff
>>>>   #endif
>>>     Will there be a userspace patch for this along shortly?
>>>
>>>     Hugo.
>>>
>>> [1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Development_notes.2C_please_read
>>>


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-01 11:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-01  8:47 [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label Jeff Liu
2011-09-01  9:00 ` Hugo Mills
2011-09-01  9:18   ` Jeff Liu
2011-09-01  9:32     ` Hugo Mills
2011-09-01 11:48       ` [PATCH] Btrfs: added new ioctl to set fs label V2 Jeff Liu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox